09.04.2013 Views

Chapters 1 - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Chapters 1 - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Chapters 1 - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Management Alternatives<br />

Implement Water Quality Monitoring – A water quality monitoring program<br />

to regularly collect data regarding the basic physical parameters of the waters<br />

within the Refuge would be implemented per available funding.<br />

Monitor Tidal Channel Bathymetry <strong>and</strong> Channel Bank Stability – Tidal<br />

channel bathymetry <strong>and</strong> channel bank stability would be monitored annually to<br />

determine changes related to erosion <strong>and</strong>/or sedimentation.<br />

Exp<strong>and</strong> Opportunities of Research – Research projects that are consistent<br />

with Refuge purposes <strong>and</strong> the mission of the NWRS would be identified for<br />

implementation on the Refuge to benefit Refuge resources <strong>and</strong> improve<br />

management effectiveness.<br />

Monitor Changes Related to Climate Change <strong>and</strong> Sea Level Rise – Funding<br />

<strong>and</strong> partnerships would be sought to routinely monitor <strong>and</strong> record tidal<br />

elevations, changes in habitat quality <strong>and</strong>/type over time, <strong>and</strong> changes in avian<br />

<strong>and</strong> fish species composition to better underst<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> address the effects of<br />

climate change <strong>and</strong> sea level rise on Refuge resources.<br />

Improve the Quality of Runoff Entering the Marsh – Through the formation of<br />

a multiple agency partnership, measures to reduce water pollution levels in the<br />

Bolsa Chica <strong>and</strong> East Garden Grove-Wintersburg flood control channels would<br />

be designed <strong>and</strong> implemented.<br />

Restore Native Habitat – Habitat restoration would be implemented on<br />

approximately 37 acres of disturbed upl<strong>and</strong> within the Refuge. The types of<br />

habitats to be restored vary among the two action alternatives.<br />

3.4.3 Detailed Description of the Alternatives<br />

3.4.3.1 Alternative A - No Action<br />

The No Action Alternative (Figure 3-2) proposes no changes to the present management or<br />

public use activities occurring on the Refuge. However, as is the case today, if the Navy were<br />

to determine that the mission of NWSSB could be compromised by the public use activities<br />

currently occurring on the Refuge, these activities could be curtailed or eliminated.<br />

<strong>Wildlife</strong> <strong>and</strong> Habitat Management<br />

The majority of the wildlife <strong>and</strong> habitat management activities occurring on the Refuge are<br />

being implemented in accordance with the approved Endangered Species Management <strong>and</strong><br />

Protection Plan (Protection Plan) (USFWS <strong>and</strong> Navy 1991). The primary objective of this<br />

plan was <strong>and</strong> continues to be the establishment of a more naturally balanced ecosystem to<br />

support the endangered species <strong>and</strong> other native wildlife occurring within the Refuge <strong>and</strong><br />

surrounding NWSSB. To achieve this objective, two important milestones had to be achieved:<br />

1) eliminate the non-native population of red fox on the Refuge <strong>and</strong> adjacent Station; <strong>and</strong> 2)<br />

reestablish a coyote population to maintain a healthy predator balance. Both of these<br />

Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan/Environmental Assessment 3-11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!