09.04.2013 Views

Chapters 1 - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Chapters 1 - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Chapters 1 - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Environmental Consequences<br />

Public Use<br />

The public use activities proposed under Alternative A would have no adverse effects related to<br />

vectors <strong>and</strong> odors.<br />

5.7.1.6 Effects to Economics/Employment<br />

<strong>Wildlife</strong> <strong>and</strong> Habitat Management<br />

Under Alternative A, the Refuge would continue to maintain its existing staffing levels (i.e., one full<br />

time permanent Refuge Manager <strong>and</strong> one part time term maintenance worker). Therefore, the<br />

effects to economics <strong>and</strong> employment at the local <strong>and</strong> regional level of implementing Alternative A<br />

would be negligible.<br />

Public Use<br />

Since the Refuge would continue to have limited opportunities for public access, the economic<br />

benefit of the Refuge to the regional economy is low. The Refuge does however provide some<br />

regional economic benefits. An estimate of these benefits was developed using the procedures <strong>and</strong><br />

data in Banking on Nature 2006: The Economic Benefits to Local Communities of National<br />

<strong>Wildlife</strong> Refuge Visitation (Carver <strong>and</strong> Caudill 2007).<br />

The estimate took into consideration the following information. The Refuge’s average total<br />

number of visitors annually is approximately 1,000, with an average visit lasting four hours. The<br />

two special event days draw additional visitors. Since hunting <strong>and</strong> fishing are not allowed on this<br />

Refuge, all of the Refuge’s visitors participate in non-consumptive activities such as interpretation<br />

<strong>and</strong> wildlife observation. The retail sales associated with Refuge visitation were calculated using<br />

visitor days <strong>and</strong> the average recreation expenditures per person per visitor day for the Region 1<br />

area, which included California at the time the 2006 study was prepared. Retail sales include<br />

lodging <strong>and</strong> transportation. Table 5-3 depicts the estimated visitation <strong>and</strong> expenditures for the<br />

Seal Beach NWR in 2006 based on this study. Expenditures are likely to be somewhat lower in<br />

2010 as a result of the current economic downturn.<br />

Table 5-3<br />

Estimated Visitation <strong>and</strong> Expenditures<br />

for the Seal Beach NWR in 2009<br />

Number of Visitors Visitor Days Retail Sales<br />

Resident 1,216 607.75 $18,165<br />

Non-Resident 215 107.25 $11,687<br />

Total Impacts $1,430 $715 $29,852<br />

Using these retail expenditures <strong>and</strong> a regional multiplier, the final dem<strong>and</strong> was calculated, which is<br />

the difference in all final consumers’ expenditures in the area attributable to refuge visitation<br />

(Carver <strong>and</strong> Caudill 2007). This spending creates jobs. The IMPLAN software was used to<br />

calculate the jobs <strong>and</strong> tax revenue generated from the visitation of the Refuge using Orange<br />

County <strong>and</strong> Los Angeles County data (Caudill 2008). These economic benefits are provided in<br />

Table 5-4. All of these benefits would continue under Alternative A.<br />

Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan 5-75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!