10.04.2013 Views

A Basic Course in Anthropological Linguistics (Studies in Linguistic ...

A Basic Course in Anthropological Linguistics (Studies in Linguistic ...

A Basic Course in Anthropological Linguistics (Studies in Linguistic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

140 A BASIC COURSE IN ANTHROPOLOGICAL LINGUISTICS<br />

OBJECTm FIELD SPEAKER HEARER HANDLING OF TOPIC,<br />

(SENDER) (RECEIVER) RUNNING OF THIRD PERSON<br />

SITUATION 1 a<br />

SITUATION lb<br />

OBJECTIVE FIELD BLANK<br />

DEVOID OF RUNNING h!J<br />

SITUATION 2<br />

SITUATION<br />

SITUATION 4<br />

OBJECTIVE FIELD BLANK<br />

SITUATION 5<br />

OBJECTIVE FIELD BLANK<br />

ENGLISH ... ”HE IS RUNNING”<br />

HOPI ... “WARI.” (RUNNING,<br />

STATEMENT OF FACT)<br />

ENGLISH ... ‘HE RAN“<br />

HOPI ... ’WARI.” (RUNNING,<br />

STATEMENT OF FACT)<br />

ENGLISH ... ”HE IS RUNNING‘<br />

HOPI ... “WARI.” (RUNNING,<br />

STATEMENT OF FACT)<br />

ENGLISH ... “HE RAN”<br />

HOPI ... ”EWIWARI.‘ (RUNNING,<br />

STATEMENT OF FACT<br />

FROM MEMORY)<br />

ENGLISH ... ‘HE WILL RUN‘<br />

HOPI ... “WARIKNI.’ (RUNNING,<br />

STATEMENT OF<br />

EXPECTATION)<br />

ENGLISH ... ‘HE RUNS” (E.G. ON<br />

THE TRACK TEAM)<br />

HOPI ... ‘WARIKNGWE.’ (RUNNING<br />

STATEMENT OF LAW)<br />

The WH has been a topic of fierce debate among l<strong>in</strong>guists, ever s<strong>in</strong>ce<br />

Whorf articulated it <strong>in</strong> the 1940s. Those opposed to the WH allege that it leads<br />

to the conclusion that we are prisoners of the languages we speak. But the WH<br />

makes no such strong claim. It simply states that language and cognition<br />

<strong>in</strong>teract. And it certa<strong>in</strong>ly does not claim that the realities of others cannot be<br />

learned. This happens every time someone learns a foreign language, as a<br />

recent study of Navajo children shows (Kramsch 1998: 13-14). Navajo<br />

children speak a language that encodes the actions of “piclung up a round<br />

object,” such as a ball, and “pick<strong>in</strong>g up a long, th<strong>in</strong> flexible object,” such as a<br />

rope, as obligatory categories. When presented with a blue rope, a yellow<br />

rope, and a blue stick, and asked to choose which object goes best with blue<br />

rope, Navajo children tend to choose the yellow rope, associat<strong>in</strong>g the objects<br />

on the basis of their shapes, whereas English-speak<strong>in</strong>g children almost always<br />

choose the blue stick, associat<strong>in</strong>g the objects on the basis of color, even though<br />

both groups of children are perfectly able to dist<strong>in</strong>guish colors and shapes.<br />

The experiment shows that speakers tend to sort out and dist<strong>in</strong>guish th<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>g to the categories provided by their languages. However, Navajo<br />

children who had studied English chose the blue stick and yellow rope <strong>in</strong> a<br />

fairly equal way.<br />

SPECIALIZED VOCABULARIES<br />

Speciahzed vocabularies lend themselves particularly well as litmus tests of<br />

the WH. Take, for <strong>in</strong>stance, lunship terms. In English, the primary k<strong>in</strong>ship

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!