23.04.2013 Views

fulltext - Simple search

fulltext - Simple search

fulltext - Simple search

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Kjel Knutsson<br />

The site as a sacred place<br />

Artefacts, their production and use obviously have a strong symbolic and<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

per, not only the material “sacred” remains of past events are important in<br />

the construction of narratives explaining the world, but the landscape in<br />

which they are situated. “Landscapes contain traces of past activities, and<br />

people select the stories they tell, the memories and histories they evoke,<br />

the interpretative narratives that they weave, to further their activities in the<br />

<br />

No doubt the landscape in different ways has to be incorporated into the<br />

life world and thus the narratives of groups in habiting that world. Perhaps<br />

<br />

nies in New Guinea evoke powerful images of landscapes, paths and places<br />

through which, as they harden in the course of the singing; “living people<br />

<br />

in Ingold 1996:215 f). If this animated world was inside the heads of these<br />

people, it must at the same time have served as a mnemonic device, bridging<br />

the present with past events through material culture.<br />

The built environment, the named and used landscape, is thus a break<br />

to “ceaseless change” and might explain the long sequences of continuity<br />

in material symbolism that we see in many prehistoric setting. But, as Lo<br />

<br />

nt: “we lack their spontaneous and unselfconscious use of their own cultural<br />

conventions” (Lowenthal In Ingold 1996:209). “…we can never fully enter<br />

their perceptual world”. That is as a past that is with us. “Nothing repli<br />

cates the past as it was for those who lived it as their present” (ibid:209f).<br />

None of us doubts that “people select the stories they tell”, the narrative is<br />

written from the historical position of the writer, but, as I will argue, there<br />

are constraints, constraints activated through the ”discriminant judgement<br />

of the (perceptually) skilled practioner” (Ingold 1996:48). The landscape is<br />

<br />

always in a dialogue between the historical present and historical/mythical<br />

narratives represented in and carried by sacred places and relics.<br />

I have already pointed out the drive for meaning that is triggered as re<br />

production for some reason fails. History as a past before us is activated in<br />

these circumstances. Not only archaeology but sociology was established as<br />

an answer to the same type of cognitive insecurity that characterizes these<br />

172

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!