fulltext - Simple search

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Simple production and social strategies: do they meet? calBC Period Quartz Flint Other major raw materials 1900 2350 3200 3600 4000 5000 7000 9000 Early Metal Age Late Neolithic Corded Ware Late Comb Ware Typical Comb Ware Early Comb Ware Litorina Mesolithic Ancylus Mesolithic Dominant Dominant imported (copied in Finland in quartzite and quartz) few daggers Dominant Dominant Dominant bifaces, but less raw material Fair amount of imported eastern Dominant Dominant Dominant immigrants The lithic technology, and especially the quartz technology in Eastern Fen noscandia, seems very uniform throughout the Stone Age and so far it has not been possible to distinguish regional or chronological traditions within it. This is partly due to the fact that technological studies of quartz assem that few regionally or chronologically distinct tool types seem to exist. If we accept that cultural and social traditions always affect the technology regional differences in other sections of the material culture, such as ground stone tools and pottery styles, gives reason to expect these to also be found within the quartz technology. How, then, can these differences be detected and social meaning be given to them? lems and possibilities in deriving social information from predominantly very simple lithic technologies. Its emphasis is on vein quartz technology. Our perspective on stone tool research will largely be Fennoscandian or North European, to the south and west. The current research paradigm in Finland is based on the work carried out in Sweden, especially in Uppsala, during the 1980s and 1990s (e.g. Callahan 1987; Callahan et al. 1992; Knutsson 1988a). A similar research orientation can also be seen in other parts of Fennoscandia (e.g. Nærøy 2000; Olofsson 2003). 247 Ground slate, quartzite, jasperoid Ground slate, porphyry, soapstone etc., indigenous and imported rocks Ground diabase and other indigenous rocks Ground slate, porphyry, other indigenous rocks, imported igneous rock Ground slate, porphyry, other indigenous rocks, imported igneous rock Ground slate, porphyry, other indigenous rocks, imported igneous rock Ground and pecked slate and diabase, indigenous and imported rocks Ground and pecked slate and diabase, indigenous and imported rocks Figure 2. Generalised outline of lithic raw material use in Finland during the Stone Age and Early Metal Age.
Tuija Rankama, Mikael A. Manninen, Esa Hertell & Miikka Tallavaara “The past in the present” in lithic research When working with assemblages representing simple lithic technologies, one must be aware of the way in which the history of research tends to guide our thinking. For example, it is not often that one comes across studies Ironically, it is almost more common to see drawings of bipolar cores mis interpreted as burins or wedges, a mistake that is a direct consequence of a lack of knowledge concerning this kind of technology. This is an example of what could be called the past in the present in lithic research, i.e., a conven should be conducted and what to study. Conventionally, simple technologies are not interesting and are therefore easily overlooked. In quartz studies the years (Knutsson 1998). The fact that vein quartz fractures somewhat differ (Callahan et al. 1992; Knutsson 1998; Rankama 2002). grained raw materials that are for the researcher, as they were for the pre quartz assemblages such things as ripple marks, bulbs of percussion, and when research avenues that have been found fruitful in other materials are because many of the traditional research methods are not applicable, but also because of the pressure exerted by the current trends in lithic research that may not prove practicable in vein quartz, either. To make things even more complicated, some varieties of quartz, such as smoky quartz, rose quartz, and quartz crystal, often do fracture much like same raw material as vein quartz. This does not mean, however, that vein 248
Page 2 and 3:
Skilled Production and Social Repro
Page 4 and 5:
Contents Acknowledgements .........
Page 6 and 7:
Kim Akerman High tech-low tech: lit
Page 8 and 9:
Authors Kim Akerman 4 Dorset St Moo
Page 10:
Introduction
Page 13 and 14:
Jan Apel and Kjel Knutsson command
Page 15 and 16:
Jan Apel and Kjel Knutsson Fig. 1.
Page 17 and 18:
Jan Apel and Kjel Knutsson It was i
Page 19 and 20:
Jan Apel and Kjel Knutsson how this
Page 21 and 22:
Jan Apel and Kjel Knutsson dimensi
Page 23 and 24:
Jan Apel and Kjel Knutsson ties. Ex
Page 25 and 26:
Jan Apel and Kjel Knutsson valuable
Page 27 and 28:
Marcia-Anne Dobres Fig. 1. Dominant
Page 29 and 30:
• knowledge and know how Marcia-A
Page 31 and 32:
Marcia-Anne Dobres Because material
Page 33 and 34:
Marcia-Anne Dobres “theoretical
Page 36:
Chapter 1 Experiments and Experienc
Page 39 and 40:
Jacques Pelegrin et al. 1975, Kelt
Page 41 and 42:
Jacques Pelegrin from a comparative
Page 43 and 44:
Jacques Pelegrin Morphological char
Page 45 and 46:
Jacques Pelegrin Fig. 2. Top: 4 rep
Page 47 and 48:
Jacques Pelegrin 46
Page 49 and 50:
Archaeological results Jacques Pele
Page 51 and 52:
Jacques Pelegrin In one of the rich
Page 53 and 54:
Jacques Pelegrin 52 Fig. 6. Blades
Page 55 and 56:
Jacques Pelegrin length of 34.5 cm.
Page 57 and 58:
Jacques Pelegrin The large blades f
Page 59 and 60:
Jacques Pelegrin Large blades found
Page 61 and 62:
Jacques Pelegrin a slightly concave
Page 63 and 64:
Jacques Pelegrin panding in the dis
Page 65 and 66:
Jacques Pelegrin piqueteur”; Gesl
Page 67 and 68:
Jacques Pelegrin in prep.). It is
Page 69 and 70:
Jacques Pelegrin pressure blades pr
Page 71 and 72:
Hugo Nami core preparation was us
Page 73 and 74:
Hugo Nami on the leg (Fig. 3a, 4a)
Page 75 and 76:
Hugo Nami kes resulting in the Firs
Page 77 and 78:
Hugo Nami During the entire core re
Page 79 and 80:
Hugo Nami this reason, some archaeo
Page 81 and 82:
Hugo Nami nodule morphology, mate
Page 83 and 84:
Greg R. Nunn Archaeological evidenc
Page 85 and 86:
Prior research Greg R. Nunn Prior r
Page 87 and 88:
Greg R. Nunn Type 1C Attribute Tabl
Page 89 and 90:
Type 1C Attribute Table Table 7. Da
Page 91 and 92:
Greg R. Nunn Figure 6. Holding posi
Page 93 and 94:
Greg R. Nunn 92 Figure 9. (a) Ishi
Page 95 and 96:
Overview Greg R. Nunn The knapper m
Page 97 and 98:
Greg R. Nunn explained in stage f
Page 99 and 100:
Greg R. Nunn Sandstone slabs were p
Page 101 and 102:
Greg R. Nunn the preform will need
Page 103 and 104:
Greg R. Nunn if one pushes too har
Page 105 and 106:
Greg R. Nunn 104 Figure 18. Stage s
Page 107 and 108:
Greg R. Nunn of 5 cm, and the grea
Page 109 and 110:
Greg R. Nunn apprentices. In additi
Page 111 and 112:
Figure 24. Original Type 1C ground
Page 113 and 114:
Greg R. Nunn After the handle and r
Page 116 and 117:
Apel, J. & Knutsson, K., 2006. Skil
Page 118 and 119:
Figure 3. Replica of Type I-C dagge
Page 120 and 121:
Figure 9. The infamous Skatelöv da
Page 122 and 123:
Figure 14. Original Stage 4 Seconda
Page 124 and 125:
Neolithic Danish Daggers: an experi
Page 126 and 127:
Figure 28. Side view of same prefor
Page 128 and 129:
Figure 34. Finished Stage 5 Final P
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Figure 48. Author grinding dagger r
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138:
Notes Neolithic Danish Daggers: an
Page 141 and 142:
Hugo Nami Archaeological background
Page 143 and 144:
Experimental study Hugo Nami Most
Page 145 and 146:
Stage 1. Obtaining the blank Hugo N
Page 147 and 148:
Figure 8. Stage 2 made on a tabular
Page 149 and 150:
Hugo Nami the platforms by formin
Page 151 and 152:
Final considerations Hugo Nami I co
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Figure 1. The archaeologist under a
Page 158 and 159:
A genealogy of reflexivity: the ski
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Continuity of place: actions and na
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199: Continuity of place: actions and na
Page 202 and 203: Ritual deposits Continuity of place
Page 208 and 209: Apel, J. & Knutsson, K., 2006. Skil
Page 210 and 211: Skill and experimental archaeology
Page 216 and 217: Figure 4. Relationship between theo
Page 222 and 223: Knowledge and know-how in the Oldow
Page 230 and 231: Cores Knowledge and know-how in the
Page 240 and 241: Discussion Knowledge and know-how i
Page 244: Knowledge and know-how in the Oldow
Page 247: Tuija Rankama, Mikael A. Manninen,
Page 251 and 252: Tuija Rankama, Mikael A. Manninen,
Page 261 and 262: Conclusion Tuija Rankama, Mikael A.
Page 266 and 267: Skill and the question of blade cra
Page 276: Skill and the question of blade cra
Page 279 and 280: Mikkel Sørensen perspective A lit
Page 281 and 282: Mikkel Sørensen regular and irregu
Page 283 and 284: Mikkel Sørensen The new dynamic te
Page 285 and 286: Mikkel Sørensen within the last ph
Page 287 and 288: Mikkel Sørensen blades are, du
Page 289 and 290: Mikkel Sørensen included removals
Page 291 and 292: Mikkel Sørensen to this, this auth
Page 293 and 294: Mikkel Sørensen Explaining the tec
Page 295 and 296: Mikkel Sørensen historic events an
Page 297 and 298: Acknowledgements Mikkel Sørensen T
Page 300 and 301:
Page 302 and 303:
Manifesting microliths: insights an
Page 304 and 305:
Page 306 and 307:
Page 308 and 309:
Page 310 and 311:
Page 312 and 313:
Page 314 and 315:
Page 316 and 317:
Page 318 and 319:
Some remarks on contacts between La
Page 320 and 321:
Page 322:
Page 325 and 326:
Kim Akerman recognise six or seven
Page 327 and 328:
Kim Akerman Antiquity of human occu
Page 329 and 330:
Kim Akerman head and lashing the t
Page 331 and 332:
Kim Akerman Jarung and ilera were c
Page 333 and 334:
Kim Akerman describe margin tre
Page 335 and 336:
Kim Akerman es) would bring herds
Page 337 and 338:
Kim Akerman lashing the stone elem
Page 339 and 340:
Kim Akerman calyptus trees. Once th
Page 341 and 342:
Kim Akerman end protrudes to form a
Page 343 and 344:
Kim Akerman tural factors that ensu
Page 345 and 346:
Kim Akerman more obtuse than the
Page 347 and 348:
Kim Akerman in the paper. L-R: sil
Page 349 and 350:
Per Falkenström • Implications w
Page 351 and 352:
Per Falkenström 1987:68). Other f
Page 353 and 354:
Per Falkenström amounts of stone,
Page 355 and 356:
Per Falkenström Raw materials and
Page 357 and 358:
Per Falkenström Similar to in sout
Page 359 and 360:
Per Falkenström such as kinship
Page 362 and 363:
Page 364 and 365:
Ground stone hammer axes in Sweden
Page 366 and 367:
Page 368 and 369:
Page 370 and 371:
Page 372 and 373:
Page 374 and 375:
Page 376 and 377:
Page 378 and 379:
Page 380 and 381:
Page 382 and 383:
Page 384 and 385:
Page 386:
Page 389 and 390:
Witold Migal 1983) (Figs. 6, 7) and
Page 391 and 392:
Witold Migal Figure 4. Core from th
Page 393 and 394:
Witold Migal is a 42 cm long core w
Page 395 and 396:
Witold Migal Figure 7b. One core fo
Page 397 and 398:
Witold Migal with a wooden pole lev
Page 399 and 400:
Witold Migal Among others, Russian
Page 401 and 402:
Kim Darmark 63f.). However, the pre
Page 403 and 404:
Kim Darmark The amount of splinter
Page 405 and 406:
100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 49 10 13 27
Page 407 and 408:
Kim Darmark hammerstones retain a r
Page 409 and 410:
Kim Darmark Jettböle differs from
Page 411 and 412:
Page 413 and 414:
Page 415 and 416:
Page 417 and 418:
Page 419 and 420:
Page 421 and 422:
Page 423 and 424:
Page 425 and 426:
Page 427 and 428:
Page 429 and 430:
Page 431 and 432:
Page 433 and 434:
Page 435 and 436:
Page 437 and 438:
Page 439 and 440:
Page 441 and 442:
Page 443 and 444:
Page 445 and 446:
Page 447 and 448:
Page 449 and 450:
Page 451 and 452:
Page 453 and 454:
Page 455:
Skilled production and Social Repro
show all

fulltext - Simple search

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?