23.04.2013 Views

fulltext - Simple search

fulltext - Simple search

fulltext - Simple search

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Rethinking the lithic blade definition: towards a dynamic understanding<br />

A study of the blade concepts in the Early Mesolithic (Maglemosian, ca.<br />

9000–6000 BC) in Scandinavia and Northern Germany (Sørensen in press<br />

<br />

amined the lithic chaînes opératoires, and especially the step involving blade<br />

production, on six Maglemosian sites and 17 additional sites, it became ap<br />

<br />

<br />

production through the entire period. However only during the late Maglem<br />

osian (phase 3,4,5) (Petersen 1973) the serially produced removals made for<br />

tools and microliths has a morphology that can “allow” the term “blades”<br />

<br />

describe the Maglemosian as a period where “blades” were produced only<br />

Figure 3. Blade production by means of direct hard percussion using a quartzite stone<br />

hammer. The core is held on the ground and struck at an angle of approximately 70 degrees.<br />

The blades are large, irregular and characterized by a distinct set of attributes:<br />

large bulbs, impact cones on the butt. A study of the prehistoric blade production<br />

and a comparison of the blades and their attributes to original and recently produced<br />

blades concluded that the direct hard hammer technique was used during the earliest<br />

Early Maglemosian Period in Southern Scandinavia. The production of big irregular<br />

blades was, during the Early Maglemosian and the Ertebølle Period, used to make pre-<br />

<br />

<br />

concept) reveals a true blade concept. Photo J. Sørensen.<br />

283

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!