03.06.2013 Views

Vol. I - The Coptic Orthodox Church

Vol. I - The Coptic Orthodox Church

Vol. I - The Coptic Orthodox Church

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

His<br />

ideophonetic<br />

arrangement.<br />

Arrangement<br />

of the<br />

proposed<br />

Dictionary.<br />

Polyphonous<br />

symbols.<br />

Natural<br />

classification<br />

of symbols.<br />

<strong>The</strong> tabulated<br />

symbols to<br />

form the key.<br />

XX Introduction.<br />

M. Champollion, and of their application to the monuments of the<br />

Egyptians." <strong>The</strong> dictionary does not claim even comparative<br />

of such<br />

perfection, " but it has been judged that the publication<br />

a work might be of slight service to those who are desirous of<br />

possessing, in a compendious form, the results of much labour,<br />

comparison and instruction." <strong>The</strong> matter contained in the work<br />

is not entirely original, but the arrangement is, and " if not<br />

could at<br />

scientific, [it is] perhaps the only one by which tyros<br />

once find the particular group or word which they seek. It may<br />

be termed ideophonetic, as it embraces both principles of ideal<br />

and phonetic classification, and its arrangement has been borrowed<br />

from a language very cognate in its construction the Chinese."<br />

<strong>The</strong> hieroglyphical and English part of the Dictionary was<br />

to be divided into two parts.<br />

Part I was to contain words " com-<br />

mencing with symbols, representatives of sounds, or phonetic,"<br />

and Part II words " whose initial character is the equivalent of<br />

an idea, or ideographic." Part I was to be " subdivided into<br />

symbols, having the power of vowels or consonants, the vowels<br />

forming (on account of one symbol frequently having<br />

of many) one large class, and the consonants, according<br />

the force<br />

to their<br />

position in the <strong>Coptic</strong> alphabet." That is to say, Division I of<br />

Part I was to contain symbols or characters some of which Birch held<br />

to be polyphonous, and Division II symbols to which he had given<br />

consonantal values, and these were to be arranged in the order<br />

of the letters of the <strong>Coptic</strong> Alphabet. <strong>The</strong> internal classification<br />

of the characters or symbols was to be strictly ideographical,<br />

"<br />

taking the symbols in their arrangement, according to the<br />

rank they hold in natural and other sciences, as the human form,<br />

limbs, animals, inanimate objects, etc." At the end of the<br />

Dictionary Birch intended to give "all the symbols<br />

in a similar<br />

classification, and in a tabular view," and this section was to<br />

form the key to the whole work. With the view of illustrating<br />

the way in which he intended his Dictionary to be used, he says,<br />

" Suppose, for example, it were required to find the meaning<br />

of a group beginning with a human eye [-] as the eye is a<br />

component part of the human body,<br />

it will be found in that<br />

division in the table, and there will be affixed to the depicted eye,<br />

v[ide Nos] 13-43." In this group of words will be found all those<br />

words in which an eye [

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!