03.06.2013 Views

Vol. I - The Coptic Orthodox Church

Vol. I - The Coptic Orthodox Church

Vol. I - The Coptic Orthodox Church

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Introduction.<br />

xxiii<br />

Champollion died on March 4th, 1832, and when his brother Disapearance<br />

wished to take steps to publish the Dictionary he found that as of portions of<br />

a result of " funestes conseils des plus funestes passions," one MSS.<br />

half of each copy of the Dictionnaire had been carried off, but<br />

by whom Champollion-Figeac does not say in his edition of the<br />

Dictionnaire. All that he says on the subject there is that in<br />

spite of all opposition he succeeded in 1840 in regaining pos- <strong>The</strong>ir<br />

session of 329 folios of the copy of the Dictionnaire, which was recovery by<br />

written out fairly on sheets of paper, and a large number of the Figeaf ^<br />

slips belonging to the copy, which was kept purposely in slip 1840.<br />

form. And that having these in his hands he felt justified in<br />

thinking that he was in possession of both manuscript copies<br />

of the Dictionnaire in a nearly complete state. In a footnote<br />

he refers to a pamphlet in which he tell us how he regained<br />

of the<br />

possession of the parts of the two manuscript copies<br />

Dictionnaire which had disappeared, and as the pamphlet is<br />

now very rare, and his story is not generally known, I summarise<br />

it here.<br />

Champollion-Figeac's pamphlet is entitled, Notice sur les<br />

Manuscrits Autographes de Champollion le Jeune perdus en I'Annee<br />

1832, et retrouvcs en 1840. Paris, March, 1842. He says that<br />

when in April, 1832, he set to work to arrange his brother's literary-<br />

effects with the view of offering the MSS. to the Government, porti ns of<br />

he found at once that several of the most important of them were Champollion 's<br />

missing. He devoted himself to the task of making enquiries m issing.<br />

for them among his brother's friends, but they could give him<br />

no information about them, and the only result of his labour<br />

was to make widely known the fact that they were lost. <strong>The</strong><br />

savants of the day, remembering how freely Champollion lent his<br />

writings to his intimate friends, hoped that they were not lost<br />

but only mislaid by some friend who had forgotten all about them.<br />

A year passed, and nothing was heard of the lost manuscripts.<br />

Meanwhile Champollion-Figeac began to suspect that one of his<br />

champollion-<br />

brother's friends, a man who was peculiarly indebted to him, had Figeac's<br />

- on.- t j T4. r 11 A sea-rch for the<br />

them in his possession. This friend was a young Italian called same<br />

Salvolini, a native of Faenza, who came to Paris to study Egyptology<br />

in 1831, and who became a close friend of Champollion and<br />

his family. Champollion-Figeac's suspicions were aroused by the suspicion falls<br />

fact that a few months after the death of his brother, Salvolini on Salvolini.<br />

sent him a prospectus of a work on the inscriptions on the Rosetta<br />

Stone, the Book of the Dead, etc., which he intended to publish<br />

in three volumes quarto. That a young man, 22 years of age,<br />

b 4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!