15.06.2013 Views

ECOLOGICAL STUDIES ON TILE SYMBIOSIS OF TER ITOMYCES ...

ECOLOGICAL STUDIES ON TILE SYMBIOSIS OF TER ITOMYCES ...

ECOLOGICAL STUDIES ON TILE SYMBIOSIS OF TER ITOMYCES ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3-1.3-',, ', ConclusiOns<br />

(1) Substances rejected for use In the nelective medium<br />

The substances which allowed no (Table 3*1,, _2) or very reduced<br />

(under 50% of control growth<br />

(Table 3-1-3) wero rejected. These were<br />

Dithane, Karathane (at 0,, 0201-1)9 nystatin, OPP,, tannic acIdj<br />

salic7ylanilides sorbic acid* P*L)oA*t Richards arjar and Oatmeal agar.<br />

Zoberi (1979) vas unable to get. (; rowth of mycotCtes on P*D*A* but<br />

13atra and Batra (1979) obtained growth from mycotates of Termitgamces<br />

albuminopus on it. Batra and Batra (1966) isolated Termitamycen-on<br />

PDA but with the addition of 10 gl-l of yeast extract which presumably<br />

supplied the Ingredients missing from PDA necessary for the growth of<br />

Termito=cene Although cycloheximide allowed the growth of<br />

Ancistrotermen cavithorax and Hicrotermes associated cultures at<br />

0.003 01-1 (Table 3-1-3). the culture from Microternes was reduced<br />

bY 34%. It also affected the form of growth of Tormit=ce-9 and so<br />

was rejected* Sabourauds agarp Czapek agar and Cornmeal agar were<br />

not tested further as a great deal of contamination occurred an tlie<br />

plates*<br />

(1-7) Substances selected for further testing<br />

Sub: 3tances which did noteffect the form of growth of Ter-mitomyces<br />

(those mariced ' in Table 3,1,3) were tested further to assess their<br />

effect on cont=inating fungi.<br />

3.1.4 Er-FECTS <strong>OF</strong> CDIUX«DS FAVOURING GROWIII <strong>OF</strong> <strong>TER</strong>M<strong>ITOMYCES</strong> UN<br />

COI-MN COWAMINATING FUNGI<br />

3.1.4.1<br />

Methods<br />

Those substances not adversely affecting the growth of ýTLCrmitqmYqpI3<br />

(Table 3.1.3) were screened for their effect on 4 ccx=on contaminating<br />

fungi -<br />

82.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!