16.06.2013 Views

Provisional Drogereit pdf

Provisional Drogereit pdf

Provisional Drogereit pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

(p. 345) In our period the minuscule is written almost exclusively in Winchester and<br />

the reform circle dependent on it. Under their influence beautiful Anglo-Saxon<br />

handwriting is still occasionally appearing. One good example can be seen in the<br />

Salisbury Psalter (Pal. Soc. 189). The writing is similar in thickness to the Caroline<br />

minuscule, from which the a is occasionally borrowed. The letters are somewhat<br />

rounded, but remain tightly together, and they all have a vertical axis. The ascenders<br />

and descenders are shortened. The upper shafts have a slight triangular thickening. All<br />

letter-forms demonstrate beautiful proportions. We are now rarely encountering a<br />

high e in the text, whereas the round s is very frequent within the body of the word.<br />

At around the end of the century the various influences of the minuscule can be<br />

established for different locations, with several writing schools being recognisable 54 .<br />

We will now move on from a general observation to a more detailed examination of<br />

the characteristics of the individual scribes.<br />

2. Comparison of the script of the charters of Aethelstan A (p. 345)<br />

Charters: Anc. Ch III, 3 & 5<br />

The script of Aethelstan A is heavy and angular. The letters are small and close<br />

together. They are not written delicately or carefully as we find later on, in fact<br />

several are rather stunted. As this script also lacks any regularity, it is less<br />

calligraphic. – The vertical strokes on the left side all have a broad triangular<br />

thickening at the top end. With the descenders of f, r and s the thickened end leans<br />

slightly towards the left.<br />

The general impression that this is of the same hand is reinforced by the similar<br />

composition of individual letter-forms, even though there are isolated deviations,<br />

which we can assume arose from the three-year gap between them.<br />

The pictorial invocation of both charters is a cross consisting of a main stroke,<br />

thinning and curving outwards to the right and with a thickening top left. A thick<br />

horizontal bar inclining slightly to the right and up, cuts through the shaft above the<br />

centre. – The crosses in front of the witnesses’ names, which are positioned on a<br />

vertical line (see Anc. Ch. III, 5 Col. 2), all resemble that initial cross. (During this<br />

period there is no ‘signature writing’ 2 .) The irregular horizontal stroke runs at times<br />

horizontally, at times resembling a wavy line.<br />

54 We refer here, for example, to the Sherborne Pontifical (New. Pal. Soc. 111 and 112) as well as the<br />

Canterbury Psalter (New. Pal. Soc. 163 and 164).<br />

2 Bresslau did not want to solve the question decisively, yet one can reject with Earle the fact that the<br />

crosses were handwritten. See Bresslau loc sit, p. 46 and n 4 (supported by K. Brandi) and Earle loc sit,<br />

Introduction XXXVI.<br />

345

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!