Provisional Drogereit pdf

d) Internal rhyme (p. 362):
C. S. 677: “non nos patria indoeptae pacis securos. Sed quasi foetidae corruptelae in
voraginem casuros.” “quasi peripsema. Quisquiliarum abiciens. Superna ad instar
pretiosorum monilium eligens. Animum sempiternis in gaudiis figens.”
C. S. 702 : “non lacteo inmarciscibilium liliorum candore amabilis. Sed fellita
heiulandae corruptionis amaritudine odibilis. Foetentis filios valle in
lacrimarum carnis.” “a bonis beatisque naribus inestimabiliter dulcia
capiuntur. Sineque calce auribus clivipparum 97 suavia audiuntur.”
Both charters differ minimally in the context, but apart from that, only in the
Proem, which both times is broken down into the general part (Proemium) and
the personal part (Exposition) 98 . But the Proem are also similar in a) wording
and b) two distinct pictures.
C. S. 677 C. S. 702
a) foetidae corruptelae
foetentis carnis…
infima abiciens…
fastidiunt infima…
b) superna eligens
dulcescunt superna
mellifluae dulcedinis
mellifluaque…odoramina
diris …mortalitatis latratibus hejulandae corruptionis
in voraginem casuros
rictibus dilacerat
Such a personal style 99 as this never appears again. We find the external expression
changing to the impersonal with the growth of the Dispositive section, which was
neglected by Ae. A, and the shrinking of the Proem and Sanction in the more recent
charters.
If we now examine the individual charter sections 100 , we see many more
idiosyncrasies.
The royal style follows on from the Exposition without any of the linking words such
as “idcirco”, familiar from all other charters;
97 It is possible here to revert to an older handwriting that was perhaps known to him, which was
written in the Anglo-Saxon letters of the 8 th Century, and from which he took the apparently unknown
word within the context. Indeed, we find in the later charter C. S. 703 divipparum, to be investigated in
more detail. This word would make sense than the not so clear clivipparum (divipparum = divus and
par = godlike). And Anglo-Saxon Hss. of the 8 th Century also used a superscript d, whose bowl is open
at the top, which can easily result in a d being mistaken for a cl. We believe that it should certainly read
divipparum here.
98 Here again we are using Hall’s termini.
99 In this context we would also like to draw attention to something new that is to be found in C. S. 663
(see below). He writes gibonifer, a word that that can only originate from the Anglo-Saxon gifo (Old-
Saxon gebono) and fer i.e. it would mean fork-carrier.
100 Hall was already combining the complete wording. See Studies p. 341 Appendix III.
362