16.06.2013 Views

Provisional Drogereit pdf

Provisional Drogereit pdf

Provisional Drogereit pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(p. 422) From Oswald a series of charters have been preserved allowing us to initially<br />

assume that his scribes were the originators; they developed a brisk business, which<br />

was not even interrupted by the assumption of the archbishopric. In Oswald's charters<br />

since 984 (C. D. 644) we find occasional expressions which originate from the<br />

charters of Ae. A, for instance:<br />

C.D. 644: "Ego ... episcopali sublimatus in sede."<br />

C.D. 646: "... cum omnibus ad eam utilitatibus rite pertinentibus ...."<br />

This is not much, but, along with a few other small points, is sufficiently<br />

characteristic to enable us to state that around 984 one of Oswald's scribes used a<br />

charter from Ae. A in the interests of structuring his diplomatic somewhat differently.<br />

The "expeditio contra hostes" 208 that we find in C. S. 701 also fits into this period.<br />

Here was a genuine model from 934, which was later interpolated and probably<br />

rewritten.<br />

Aethelstan B (p. 422)<br />

There are two charters bearing the hallmarks of his diplomatic to a major extent, and<br />

these arouse suspicion.<br />

C. S. 752, dating from the year 940, is for Abbot Dunstan. The latter probably did not<br />

become Abbot of Glastonbury until 946 209 . Ae. B does not use the "Quatinus"<br />

formula, nor does the royal style form part of his diplomatic (see Ae. C).<br />

C. S. 775 changes some expressions, the dating names numerous ‘duces’ of whom<br />

Dux Wulgar (the Second) and Admund cannot be identified. Then both archbishops<br />

signed this charter from the time of Eadmund. This does not occur in authentic<br />

charters. The spelling of the names is so poor that here too are grounds for strong<br />

suspicion. The Archbishop of York’s signature can only be deemed a complete fake.<br />

The paragraph from the boundary clause reading:<br />

"This is the tweire hide boch at Winterburne the Admund king ibokede Wenfleda on<br />

echenhalue into cheselburne. tho sealde hire Alfsige V. hiden thar midde, this sand<br />

thare ... hide land imare at Winterburne"<br />

is incomprehensible; in addition, the paragraph up to "this sand ..." corresponds to the<br />

endorsement.<br />

This charter must be rejected.<br />

Eadmund A (p. 422)<br />

C. S. 764 is a three-part gift, the only one that we find among the king's charters. The<br />

signatures of Wulfhelm and Aldhelm<br />

208 Hodgkin, loc sit., p. 373 ff. The whole of Aethelred’s reign was beset with war against the Danes.<br />

209 Anglo-Saxon Chronicle II, 144.<br />

422

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!