Provisional Drogereit pdf

C. S. 753 (p. 374): “Dum omnis. creatura…formata formoseque creata atque speciose
plasmata…”
C. S. 767 117 : “…ut Deum quem diligimus et credimus…”
C. S. 780: “Dum…cernerem sepeque cogitarem…cuncta vel superflua redarguuntur
ac dissipantur…”
C. S. 781: “…supernus rector…gubernat atque custodit”
C. S. 821: “…que sollicitudo…conqueritur ac defletur.”
The royal style is worded differently in the originals each time, in one case Ae. C
shortens that of Ae. B. (C. S. 753). In the initial period he prefers this version:
“Quapropter ego…divina mihi adridente gratia rex Anglorum” (et curagulus 118
totius Bryttanniae in C. S. 741).
Thus in C. S. 741; 756; 767.
In the last charters he writes:
“…ego...rex Anglorum ceterarumque gentium in circuitu persistentium
(gubernator et rector)”
In C. S. 780; 821.
The Dispositive section can be described as the best characterising section of any
scribe’s charter. (C. S. 780 stands aside due to the legal quality of the handed down
land. 119 )
The characterising sections are:
“Perpetuali donatione libenter concedo…”
in C. S. 741; 756; 767; the traditional words of the other charters are related to this,
e.g. C. S. 821: “libenter largiendo donavi” and C. S. 753 “largiendo condonavi”
“in illo loco cui ruricolae”
in C. S. 741; 756; 767. Here he has changed since C. S. 780 to
“…ubi iamdudum solicolae illius regionis nomen imposuerunt…”
“Quatinus ille bene perfruatur ac perpetualiter possideat…”
This particularly characteristic Quatinus form has a distinctive sentence, composed of
two originally separate parts, which remain together in the summary.
C. S. 741 0 : “…et post se cuicumque voluerit ceu corroboravimus…derelinquat.”
117 With this Proem only the appearance of the doubling would point to Ae.C, the remaining structure
to Ae. B. However, as this “diligimus et credimus” is taken from biblical language, it is not of
particular significance as a characteristic of Ae. C. We therefore believe that Ae. B can actually be
considered the producer of the Proem, which Ae. C then took on. Such independence, even if minimal,
demands that both scribes work side by side. This could only take place in a “scriptorium” of course, in
which these two scribes were working together for different recipients.
118 With this “curagulus” there seems to be some influence from C. S. 714
119 See Note 1, p. 372 and Part 4.
374