Provisional Drogereit pdf

C. S.753 0 (p. 375): “…et post se cuicumque voluerit perenniter heredi. derelinquat ceu
supra diximus…”
(This last version appears once more in C. S. 780.)
C. S. 756: “…et post se cuicumque voluerit ceu corroboravimus perenniter heredi
derelinquat ceu supra diximus…”
in C. S. 767; 781; 821.
He formulates the usual “quamdiu vivat” as follows: “quamdiu istius caducis seculi
vitam tenere presumet…”
The Immunitay clause is still: (exc. C. S. 780)
“Sit autem predictum rus liberum ab omni mundiali obstaculo cum omnibus
ad se rite pertinentibus…excepto…”
For the Sanction he always uses the Glacier Sanction (exc. 780) in the singular, which
also contains the emendation form. We first find the Sanction in the Wilton charter C.
S. 714, the Proem and other sentence parts reminding us of our charters.
C. S. 714: “Si quis autem, quod non optamus, hanc nostram donationem infringere
temptaverit, perpessus sit gelidis glaciarum flatibus et malignorum spirituum.
Terribiles tormentorum cruciatus evasisse non quiescat. nisi prius inriguis…”
This Sanction is then taken on by Ae. B, but changed to:
C. S. 728: “Denique vero si quis nobis non optantibus nostrum hoc donum violare
fraudulenter perpetrando consenserit aut infringere temptaverit, perpessus sit gelidis
glaciarum flatibus ex pennino exercitu malignorum spirituum nisi prius…”
Ae. C seems to have been familiar with and to have used both versions, but he makes
one more alteration by replacing “ex” with “et” and making a further addition. – The
scribe appears to have considerable freedom with his model 120 .
C. S. 741: “Si quis autem quod non optamus hanc nostram difinitionem elationis
habitu incedens infringere temptaverit, perpessus sit gelidis glaciarum flatibus et
pennino exercitu malignorum spirituum. nisi…”
Ae. C also had a certain amount of freedom with the model for his deviating Sanction
in C. S. 780. Here, among other things, he altered the plural of the presumed model to
the singular.
C. S. 708: “Hoc ius donacionis augendo conservantibus feliciter perveniat inter
celibes celestium turmarum. et sine fine in eternal doxa letentur.”
C. S. 780: “Si quis autem huius donationis munificentiam augendo voluerit, feliciter
inter coelibes celestium turmarum sine fine in aeterna doxa voti compus laetetur.”
120 Treiter, loc sit, p. 62, speaks directly of a formula book that the scribe would use as a model, also
Hall, Studies, pp. 177 and 196 and Stevenson, A Charter to St. Marin’s E. H. R. XI, 73 seem to accept
this, whereas Kemble, Codex Introd., p. XXIII, opposes this. For our stance see pp. 382 and 413.
375