Provisional Drogereit pdf

(p. 401) “Quamvis enim…Tamen” instead of the “Quamvis…Tamen” of the model.
The royal style and the beginning of the Dispositive section vaguely demonstrate the
influence of Eadmund C. also the location description:
“illo in loco ubi a ruricolis…” will have originated from the form of Eadmund C. The
remaining diplomatic is similar to that of Eadgar A. Eadgar B also uses the
“caraxantur” in the Scripta line. We are familiar with this from Eadgar A’s first
charters. One may well assume that Eadgar B was trained by Eadgar A, who also
familiarised him with the text of Eadmund C.
We encounter the common, distinct characteristic in the boundary clause, which,
according to the wording of the endorsement 146 :
“This is thara…hida land boc (landbook, see above) aet…”
is formed as follows:
“This synd tha land gemere thara…hida aet…aerest…”
(“These are the land boundaries of the ….”)
This is the main characteristic of the scribe Eadgar B.
The later Proems are also, to a limited extent, suitable for a comparison of styles.
They are put together according to old forms, occasionally being embellished by the
distinctive wording of Eadgar A.
We find this in
C. S. 1075: “…cum cuius hic transeuntis mundi felicitates in adversis successionibus
sedulo permixta et conturbata perspicitur…”
(also reminiscent of Eadgar A).
C. S. 1114: “Alme auctoritatis…”
This charter shows that Eadgar B describes the recipient in a different way from
Eadgar A, when it is a religious institution.
C. S. 1114: “…domino nostro…sanctaeque eius aecclesiae…dicate loco qui caelebri
aet…nuncupatur onomate…aeterna largitus sum hereditate…”
C. S. 1066: “…Abbandunensi aecclesiae… aeterna largitus sum
(Eadgar A) hereditate…”
Eadgar B apparently even used charter C. S. 1066 as a model. This is indicated by
both the “Alme” and “nuncupatur onomate” as well as the “aeterna largitus sum…”;
but in particular the “onomate” and “aeterna” that Eadgar A uses just in this charter.
Eadgar B makes only minor changes to the model.
Eadgar B is also strongly influenced by Eadgar A. As we can now assume that
Eadgar A first wrote as a recipient producer (see below) i.e. produced C. S. 1066 as
such, we can probably conclude that Eadgar B was an occupant of the Abingdon
monastery and was approached by Eadgar A to assist him.
146 See Excursus 2. The Dorsal Note.
401