29.06.2013 Views

entire - Deutsche Bank Annual Report 2012

entire - Deutsche Bank Annual Report 2012

entire - Deutsche Bank Annual Report 2012

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Deutsche</strong> <strong>Bank</strong> 01 – Management <strong>Report</strong> 93<br />

Financial <strong>Report</strong> 2010 Risk <strong>Report</strong><br />

During the course of 2010 we also implemented significant methodology enhancements to our economic capital<br />

model, including the following:<br />

— Extension of stress tests for securitization and correlation risk<br />

— Improved granularity for equity dividend and stock borrow risk<br />

— Enhanced coverage of basis risks<br />

Our stress testing results and economic capital estimations are necessarily limited by the number of stress<br />

tests executed and the fact that not all downside scenarios can be predicted and simulated. While our risk<br />

managers have used their best judgment to define worst case scenarios based upon the knowledge of past<br />

extreme market moves, it is possible for our market risk positions to lose more value than even our economic<br />

capital estimates. We also continuously assess and refine our stress tests in an effort to ensure they capture<br />

material risks as well as reflect possible extreme market moves.<br />

Postbank also performs scenario analyses and stress tests in addition to the value-at-risk calculations. The<br />

assumptions underlying the stress tests are validated on an ongoing basis.<br />

Value-at-Risk of Trading Units of Our Corporate & Investment <strong>Bank</strong> Group Division<br />

The following table shows the value-at-risk (with a 99 % confidence level and a one-day holding period) of the<br />

trading units of our Corporate & Investment <strong>Bank</strong> Group Division but excluding the value-at-risk of Postbank.<br />

Our trading market risk outside of these units excluding Postbank is immaterial. “Diversification effect” reflects<br />

the fact that the total value-at-risk on a given day will be lower than the sum of the values-at-risk relating to the<br />

individual risk classes. Simply adding the value-at-risk figures of the individual risk classes to arrive at an aggregate<br />

value-at-risk would imply the assumption that the losses in all risk categories occur simultaneously.<br />

in € m. Dec 31, 2010 Dec 31, 2009<br />

Value-at-risk of trading units<br />

Interest rate risk 77.4 111.0<br />

Equity price risk 21.3 37.0<br />

Foreign exchange risk 29.0 23.9<br />

Commodity price risk 13.3 14.8<br />

Diversification effect (70.1) (65.7)<br />

Total 70.9 121.0<br />

The following table shows the maximum, minimum and average value-at-risk (with a 99 % confidence level and<br />

a one-day holding period) of the trading units of our Corporate & Investment <strong>Bank</strong> Group Division for the periods<br />

specified excluding the value-at-risk of Postbank.<br />

Value-at-risk<br />

of trading<br />

units Total Diversification effect Interest rate risk Equity price risk<br />

Foreign<br />

exchange risk Commodity price risk<br />

in € m. 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009<br />

Average 95.6 126.8 (48.6) (61.6) 86.8 117.6 21.9 26.9 22.9 28.7 12.7 15.1<br />

Maximum 126.4 180.1 (88.5) (112.3) 113.0 169.2 33.6 47.3 46.4 64.4 21.2 34.7<br />

Minimum 67.5 91.9 (26.4) (35.9) 65.8 83.2 13.6 14.5 10.8 11.9 6.2 8.5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!