29.06.2013 Views

entire - Deutsche Bank Annual Report 2012

entire - Deutsche Bank Annual Report 2012

entire - Deutsche Bank Annual Report 2012

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Deutsche</strong> <strong>Bank</strong> 02 – Consolidated Financial Statements 243<br />

Financial <strong>Report</strong> 2010 Notes to the Consolidated Balance Sheet<br />

14 – Financial Instruments carried at Fair Value<br />

Management Judgment: In reaching estimates of fair value management judgment needs to be exercised. The<br />

areas requiring significant management judgment are identified, documented and reported to senior management<br />

as part of the valuation control framework and the standard monthly reporting cycle. The specialist model<br />

validation and valuation groups focus attention on the areas of subjectivity and judgment.<br />

The level of management judgment required in establishing fair value of financial instruments for which there is<br />

a quoted price in an active market is usually minimal. Similarly there is little subjectivity or judgment required<br />

for instruments valued using valuation models which are standard across the industry and where all parameter<br />

inputs are quoted in active markets.<br />

The level of subjectivity and degree of management judgment required is more significant for those instruments<br />

valued using specialized and sophisticated models and where some or all of the parameter inputs are not<br />

observable. Management judgment is required in the selection and application of appropriate parameters,<br />

assumptions and modeling techniques. In particular, where data is obtained from infrequent market transactions<br />

then extrapolation and interpolation techniques must be applied. In addition, where no market data is available<br />

then parameter inputs are determined by assessing other relevant sources of information such as historical<br />

data, fundamental analysis of the economics of the transaction and proxy information from similar transactions<br />

and making appropriate adjustment to reflect the actual instrument being valued and current market conditions.<br />

Where different valuation techniques indicate a range of possible fair values for an instrument then management<br />

has to establish what point within the range of estimates best represents the fair value. Further, some valuation<br />

adjustments may require the exercise of management judgment to ensure they achieve fair value.<br />

Fair Value Hierarchy<br />

The financial instruments carried at fair value have been categorized under the three levels of the IFRS fair value<br />

hierarchy as follows:<br />

Level 1 – Instruments valued using quoted prices in active markets: These are instruments where the fair value<br />

can be determined directly from prices which are quoted in active, liquid markets and where the instrument<br />

observed in the market is representative of that being priced in the Group’s inventory.<br />

These instruments include: high-liquidity treasuries and derivative, equity and cash products traded on highliquidity<br />

exchanges.<br />

Level 2 – Instruments valued with valuation techniques using observable market data: These are instruments<br />

where the fair value can be determined by reference to similar instruments trading in active markets, or where<br />

a technique is used to derive the valuation but where all inputs to that technique are observable.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!