29.06.2013 Views

entire - Deutsche Bank Annual Report 2012

entire - Deutsche Bank Annual Report 2012

entire - Deutsche Bank Annual Report 2012

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Deutsche</strong> <strong>Bank</strong><br />

<strong>Annual</strong> Review 2010<br />

<strong>Report</strong> of the Supervisory Board<br />

Confl icts of Interest and Their Handling<br />

The Risk Committee dealt with the loan approvals required pursuant to Section 15<br />

of the German <strong>Bank</strong>ing Act ( KWG ). Supervisory Board members who were also board<br />

members of the respective borrowing company when the resolutions were taken,<br />

or who might have faced a possible confl ict of interests for other reasons, did not participate<br />

in the discussion and voting.<br />

In September 2010, Professor Kagermann did not participate in the discussion of and<br />

voting on the submission of a public takeover off er to the shareholders of <strong>Deutsche</strong><br />

Postbank AG owing to his membership on the Supervisory Board of <strong>Deutsche</strong> Post AG<br />

and thus a possible confl ict of interests in this context.<br />

Occasionally, there were latent confl icts of interest on the part of individual Supervisory<br />

Board members. During the reporting period, Ms. Förster and Ms. Ruck were<br />

also members of the Supervisory Board of <strong>Deutsche</strong> <strong>Bank</strong> Privat- und Geschäftskunden<br />

AG as representatives of the employees. They did not participate in the discussions<br />

of and voting on topics relating to their work, such as resolutions pursuant<br />

to Section 32 of the German Co-determination Act (MitbestG). Additional special<br />

measures to address these latent and only occasional confl icts of interest were<br />

not required.<br />

Litigation<br />

As in the preceding years, the Supervisory Board was regularly informed of important<br />

lawsuits and discussed further courses of action. These included the actions for<br />

rescission and to obtain information fi led in connection with the General Meetings<br />

in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010, as well as the lawsuits brought against<br />

<strong>Deutsche</strong> <strong>Bank</strong> and Dr. Breuer by Dr. Kirch and KGL Pool GmbH. The General Meeting’s<br />

election of shareholder representatives on May 29, 2008, was contested by several<br />

shareholders. The case is currently before Germany’s Supreme Court, which will rule<br />

on the admissibility of an appeal against the decision taken by the Higher Regional<br />

Court Frankfurt am Main to dismiss the complaint.<br />

Furthermore, reports concerning important lawsuits were presented to the Supervisory<br />

Board on a regular basis and, in detail, to the Audit and Risk Committees.<br />

<strong>Annual</strong> Financial Statements<br />

KPMG Aktiengesellschaft Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, the auditor of the <strong>Annual</strong><br />

Financial Statements elected at last year’s General Meeting, has audited the accounting,<br />

the <strong>Annual</strong> Financial Statements and the Management <strong>Report</strong> for 2010 as well as the<br />

Consolidated Financial Statements with the related Notes and Management <strong>Report</strong><br />

for 2010. The audits led in each case to an unqualifi ed opinion. The Audit Committee<br />

examined the documents for the <strong>Annual</strong> Financial Statements and Consolidated<br />

Financial Statements, along with the auditor’s report, and discussed these extensively<br />

with the auditor. The Chairman of the Audit Committee reported to us on this at today’s<br />

meeting of the Supervisory Board. We agreed with the results of the audits after inspecting<br />

the auditor’s reports and documents for the the <strong>Annual</strong> Financial Statements<br />

and Consolidated Financial Statements, and after an extensive discussion, we agreed<br />

to the recommendation of the Audit Committee and determined that, also based on<br />

the results of our inspections, there were no objections to be raised.<br />

16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!