02.07.2013 Views

Untitled

Untitled

Untitled

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

110 GREGORIAN CHANT<br />

as the forerunners of those used in modern musical aesthetics (see pp.<br />

223, 228). Medieval theorists who write about plainsong never trouble<br />

to essay artistic analysis of the different parts of the chant: still less<br />

are they interested in giving a scientific description of its forms.<br />

Theorists and cantors copied the tonalia (the opening cues of litur<br />

gical melodies), which were used in every country and school and are<br />

most informative for the study of both modality and melody. They<br />

merely classified the melodies, and in so doing followed a purely<br />

and a few<br />

practical, not a scientific, method, dividing the antiphons<br />

other chants into groups according to their respective modality and<br />

the liturgical order of the texts. Expressions in the old treatises about<br />

the character or flavour of any one mode, or phrases of approbation,<br />

have as a rule a value which is purely educational, devotional or<br />

mystical.<br />

So far no legacy from the ancient composers has been found to tell<br />

us anything about their rules or practices in setting melodies to texts.<br />

Yet we can perceive that Western composers seem to have followed<br />

the same principles and rules as their Byzantine fellow-artists.<br />

Ferretti, in his Estetica Gregoriana? studied exhaustively the<br />

characteristics of every melodic form of liturgical chant, and divided<br />

the melodies into three classes: original melodies, type melodies, and<br />

melodies formed on the method which he calls centonique, that is to<br />

say a mosaic of formulas. The first type is used for one text only,<br />

emphasizing some typical character of the feast or of the place which<br />

it occupies in the liturgy: for example, the antiphons of the Introits,<br />

in which this type occurs repeatedly. The second class may be called<br />

'prototypes', for their melody was typical and distinctive, and so dear<br />

to the old composers that it served as a kind of model applicable to<br />

different texts, even if they had an entirely different sense. This type<br />

predominates in the antiphons of the Office. In the third group cento<br />

or patchwork melodies are composed out of various fragments<br />

(melodic formulas) of pre-existing tunes, logically fitted together into<br />

a pattern, after the fashion of a mosaic pavement or a patchwork quilt.<br />

The Gregorian texts were not written in classical but in ecclesiastical<br />

Latin, with the established cursus as used from the end of the fifth<br />

century to the middle of the seventh, making the declamation regular<br />

and melodious. The Gregorian composers paid full attention to the<br />

stress of the word : they did not give it a strong dynamic prominence,<br />

but a melodic one. In Gregorian chant three styles can be recognized :<br />

1 Rome, 1934, pp. 95 ff.: French edition, Esth&ique grtgorienne (Paris, 1938), pp.<br />

86 ff.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!