02.07.2013 Views

Untitled

Untitled

Untitled

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

140 TROPE, SEQUENCE, AND CONDUCTUS<br />

earlier than the end of the sixth century, but it is not even certain that<br />

it is earlier than the period when the definitive version of the Roman<br />

chant began to be circulated. All that we can say for certain at present<br />

is that these manuscripts preserve melodies which appear in some<br />

respects rather 'modern* but at the same time they bear testimony to<br />

old liturgical practices. In Vatican, lat. 5319, for example, the Alleluia<br />

after the verse is frequently a more developed form of the version<br />

preceding it: examples are the 'Alleluia Pascha', with second verse<br />

'Epulemur' (fo. 84), and the Alleluias with Greek text 'Ho kyrios<br />

ebasileusen' (fo. 85 V ) and 'Hoti theos' (fo. 97). 1<br />

GENERAL HISTORICAL SITUATION (c. 800)<br />

In order to understand the conditions in which the trope and<br />

sequence arose we must consider the general history of ecclesiastical<br />

chant in the time of Charlemagne (771-814). Charlemagne, following<br />

in the footsteps of his father Pepin, was anxious to have the liturgy<br />

and ecclesiastical chant in his kingdom moulded into conformity<br />

with those in Rome. His coronation as emperor, performed by<br />

Leo III in Rome in 800, gave religious sanction to his ideal of uni<br />

versal monarchy, and this ideal implied uniformity in ecclesiastical<br />

matters. From its alliance with the Carolingian monarchy the Papacy<br />

gained a new impulse to enforce liturgical and musical uniformity<br />

throughout the Western Church; its earlier practice had been more<br />

liberal, as we can see from a letter of Gregory I to his representative<br />

in England, in which he allowed him to take over liturgical practices<br />

wherever he found them suitable. Charlemagne's desire for uniformity<br />

had its fulfilment mainly in France, where the Gallican liturgy and<br />

Gallican chant had hitherto prevailed, though in actual fact the<br />

Roman rite itself took over certain elements of both. In Spain<br />

the Mozarabic rite and Mozarabic chant were not superseded by the<br />

Roman until the eleventh century, while in Milan the Ambrosian<br />

rite survived the move for uniformity and has continued down to the<br />

present day (see pp. 62, 64). In England conformity with the Roman use<br />

had been achieved even before the Carolingian era. England had<br />

experienced two phases of missionary activity<br />

the first from Ireland,<br />

bringing the Celtic rite, which was closely related to the Gallican,<br />

and the second from Rome, which conflicted to some extent with the<br />

first and brought the country into an increasingly closer connexion<br />

with the see of Rome.<br />

1 Facsimile of the last of these in H. M. Bannister, Monumenti Vaticani di paleografia<br />

musicale latina (1918), pi. 81a.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!