02.07.2013 Views

Untitled

Untitled

Untitled

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

GENERAL HISTORICAL SITUATION (c. 800) 141<br />

The musical history of western Europe at this period has its centre<br />

of gravity in Charlemagne's empire, and particularly in France. The<br />

consequence of the change just mentioned was that ecclesiastical<br />

chant was in future regulated by the Gregorian antiphonary. Indeed<br />

the liturgical chant books preserved in different countries after the<br />

end of the ninth century show a remarkable unity of melodic tradi<br />

tion, particularly in the Mass. From that time the repertory of<br />

liturgical chant could admit additions only in the shape of offices<br />

required for new feasts or commemorations. The logical result would<br />

have been the throttling of all creative effort in the field of church<br />

music; but that could hardly be accepted in an age so devoted to<br />

music. An outlet for musical invention was therefore found within<br />

the liturgy, and a compromise was agreed on with the ecclesiastical<br />

authorities: hence the trope and the sequence an optional addition<br />

which was merely tolerated by the Church and remained distinct from<br />

the official Roman chant<br />

We have a valuable account of the trope and sequence in the first<br />

half of the ninth century from the famous liturgist Amalar of Metz.<br />

He was, of course, an advocate of Roman chant: he had composed<br />

his own antiphonary, using elements taken from a Roman antiphonary<br />

preserved at Corbie and another at Metz, where the Roman chant had<br />

been introduced as early as the eighth century, and adding ingredients<br />

to be found in neither of them. There is still no absolute fixity at this<br />

stage, but the general plan is definitely Roman, though Amalar also<br />

refers to some Gallican practices which had persisted. He mentions<br />

the interpolations which we are discussing only as melismata, but<br />

among them are some which were later on provided with texts. For<br />

these melismata he uses the words melodiae, sequentia, and neuma,<br />

but not tropus. We may say that his conception represents an inter<br />

mediate stage: he neither treats the melodies merely as a concern of<br />

the singers nor singles them out as a special category.<br />

In referring to the Alleluia of the Mass Amalar speaks of 'haec<br />

jubilatio quam sequentiam vocant' (this jubilation which is called<br />

the *<br />

1 We may remember that this expression occurred<br />

sequence 5<br />

).<br />

also in the second Ordo Romanus? Again, when speaking of the<br />

vespers for Easter Day in Rome Amalar says that the Alleluia is<br />

sung *<br />

cum omni supplemento et excellentia versuum et sequentiarum*<br />

(richly supplemented and adorned with verses and sequences). 3 In<br />

another passage, which has also frequently been quoted, he speaks of<br />

1 Patrologia Latina, cv. 1123.<br />

a Ordo V in Andrieu's enumeration (see p. 139).<br />

8 Patrologia Latina, cv. 1295.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!