02.07.2013 Views

Untitled

Untitled

Untitled

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

DANCE MUSIC 339<br />

Its position in the manuscript leaves it uncertain whether it is to be<br />

regarded as a coda to the whole piece. The upper part, though noted<br />

on the stave with a Bb in the signature, has all the appearance of a<br />

part for a percussion instrument. The notation indicates the third<br />

rhythmic mode; but as there can be little doubt that it was meant to<br />

be played more lascivo (in jolly style), 1 i.e. with the long equal to two<br />

(not three) breves, a transcription in 2/4 time is preferable to 6/8.<br />

THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE INDIVIDUAL VOICES<br />

The intervals of the third and, to a lesser degree, the sixth were now<br />

recognized by theorists. As early<br />

as the latter half of the twelfth<br />

century 2 Theinred of Dover explains why the major and minor thirds<br />

are admitted in organa, in spite of the fact that they are not strictly<br />

consonances:<br />

Ditonus et semiditonus cum sibi condividentibus equisonas consonantias<br />

propter equisonantiam cum consonantiis admittuntur in organa. 3<br />

(The major and minor thirds, together with the intervals which combine with<br />

them to make octaves [i.e. the minor and major sixths] are allowed in organa as<br />

well as the consonant intervals, because of the octaves [which result from the<br />

combination of third and sixth].)<br />

He adds that the major third and minor sixth are more common than<br />

the minor third and major sixth. The preference is interesting, though<br />

it is based on faulty mathematics. It is obvious that the reluctance of<br />

theorists to admit thirds and sixths as consonances was due to the<br />

fact that they did not fit into the acoustic theory which they had<br />

inherited from the Greeks. Thus, the ditonus, as its name implies, was<br />

reckoned as two (major) tones, i.e. |x| = fj; whereas the ratio of<br />

the major third in the harmonic series is | or fj. But as Theinred<br />

himself says, the difference is hardly noticeable to the ear; 4 and<br />

Odington in the late thirteenth century not only mentions that many<br />

people regard the ditonus and the semiditonus as consonant, on<br />

account of their close approximation to the major third and minor<br />

third of the harmonic series, but also observes that intervals like this<br />

which are not mathematically consonant can be made to sound so<br />

1 See Robertus de Handlo, Regulae, in Coussemaker, Scriptores, i, pp. 388 and 402<br />

(the words 'in maxima quinte rubrice* in the latter place are an obvious error for *in<br />

maxima quinta quarte rubrice*), and cf. supra, p. 227, n. 2.<br />

* For the arguments in support of this date see C. C. J. Webb in the English Hw-<br />

torical Review, xxx (1915), pp. 658-60.<br />

8<br />

Oxford, Bodleian, Bodl. 842, fo. 20.<br />

4 *<br />

Ditonus qui sesqniquartae sonorum proportion! quae prima sequitur sesquitertiam<br />

adeo propinquus est, ut octogesima prima tantum parte maioris termini hie<br />

superet hanc: quod auditu percipere difficile est' (loc. cit).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!