Oregon Balance of State HIV/AIDS Housing & Services Systems ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Oregon HIV/AIDS Housing and Services Systems Integration Plan—Appendices A-45 GOALS & DESCRIPTIONS Negotiated set-asides of units for PLWHA in mainstream affordable housing projects Best in projects already developed with rents affordable to PLWHA, or when AIDS service organizations can contribute debt-free funding (such as HOPWA) A long-term lease agreement with a property manager in which a service organization funds a rent reserve to pay the difference between market rent and the amount that consumers can pay Best when market rents are not affordable and landlords are willing to enter long-term agreements A service organization leases units that are then sub-leased at an affordable cost to PLWHA Best in communities with active rental markets in healthy neighborhoods with access to support services ASSISTANCE TYPES & HOPWA–ELIGIBLE USES Set-Asides in Other Housing Projects - Can fund acquisition, rehab, etc. (new construction for SRO and group homes only) -Can fund facility operations Lease Buy-Downs - Rent reserves are not HOPWA-eligible - Can fund monthly lease, operations, and repair costs Master Leasing -Can fund monthly lease, operations, and repair costs ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES - Can help experienced developers to create new longterm housing capacity - Can be quicker and more economically efficient than dedicated development - Can be long-term - Residents can integrate into community - Can be economically efficient and ensure stability without ongoing subsidy - Less complex than facilitybased assistance - Residents can integrate into the community - Can allow organizations to place consumers quickly - Community acceptance issues can often be avoided - Residents can integrate into the community - Housing providers’ rules may disqualify some consumers - Some providers not willing to set aside units, or legally constrained - Only effective when rents are affordable - Physical design and operations may not accommodate health needs of PLWHA - Usually requires lump sum to fund entire rent reserve up front; cost may be high - Developing contracts can be complicated and time-consuming - Funders may prefer ownership to long-term lease, or set different commitment periods - Property managers may not wish to enter into long-term leases - Housing providers’ rules may disqualify some consumers - Operating subsidies usually needed for each unit - Available properties may be in unsafe neighborhoods - When necessary, displacing tenants can be complicated and expensive - Housing conditions must be carefully assessed, and close landlord relationship maintained
A-46 Appendices—Oregon HIV/AIDS Housing and Services Systems Integration Plan GOALS & DESCRIPTIONS A service organization purchases condominiums or single-family homes and leases the units to PLWHA Best in communities with active housing markets and networks that can deliver services to dispersed populations Congregate living assistance ranging from a group home owned by a service organization to a housemate referral service Best where consumer preference indicates sufficient demand to keep beds filled Independent apartment projects to meet the permanent housing needs of PLWHA, or to serve a mixed population that includes PLWHA Best where consumer preference indicates sufficient demand to keep units filled ASSISTANCE TYPES & HOPWA–ELIGIBLE USES Scattered Site Acquisition - Can fund acquisition, rehab, etc. (new construction for SRO and group homes only) Group Homes/Shared Living - Can fund acquisition, rehab, etc. - Can fund facility operations Independent Apartment Development Projects - Can fund acquisition, rehab, etc. (new construction for SRO and group homes only) - Can fund monthly lease, operations, and repair costs ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES - Can allow quick access to housing, relative to construction - Can effectively meet scattered demand - A small number of units can be developed efficiently - Residents can integrate into the community - Can be less expensive than individual apartments - Can offer peer support - Various organizations can sponsor individual rooms - Creates new long-term housing capacity - Offers owner most control, or opportunities to partner with other organizations - Units can be developed to address specific needs - Large development projects can increase an organization’s capacity to raise private donations and grants - Creates new long-term housing capacity - Can require complicated property management - Operating subsidies may be needed to keep rents affordable - Condominiums can require monthly maintenance fees and other costs; offer less control than traditional ownership; and place restrictions on residents - Most consumers prefer independent living; many prefer not to live in HIV/AIDS-dedicated facilities - If demand drops, difficult to convert facility to new use - Can be difficult to manage conflicts between housemates and to preserve confidentiality - Expensive, complex, and timeconsuming - Multifamily-zoned land can be hard to find - Can attract community opposition - Number of units needed for economic efficiency may be greater than local demand for AIDS housing - Many consumers prefer not to live in HIV/AIDS-dedicated facilities - Requires long-term commitment and operating subsidies
Page 1 and 2:
Oregon Balance of State HIV/AIDS Ho
Page 3:
Oregon Balance of State HIV/AIDS Ho
Page 7:
Table of Contents Executive Summary
Page 11 and 12:
Executive Summary—Oregon HIV/AIDS
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17:
Page 21 and 22:
Oregon HIV/AIDS Housing and Service
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67:
Page 70 and 71:
50 Oregon HIV/AIDS Housing and Serv
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77: Oregon HIV/AIDS Housing and Service
Page 80: Table of Contents Appendix 1: Affor
Page 83 and 84: A-2 Appendices—Oregon HIV/AIDS Ho
Page 91 and 92: A-10 Appendices—Oregon HIV/AIDS H
Page 136: Oregon HIV/AIDS Housing and Service
Page 145: A-64 Appendices—Oregon HIV/AIDS H
show all

Oregon Balance of State HIV/AIDS Housing & Services Systems ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?