nicole kotras masters thesis
nicole kotras masters thesis
nicole kotras masters thesis
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
28<br />
(GQ) and in their performance on four of the six scales, namely the Locomotor development,<br />
Personal-Social development, Hearing and Speech, and Performance.<br />
Children in the different SES groups differed significantly on the GQ and in their<br />
performance on four of the six scales, namely the Hearing and Speech, Eye Hand<br />
Co-ordination, Performance and Practical-Reasoning scales. On the Hearing and Speech,<br />
Eye and Co-ordination, and Practical- Reasoning scales, children from the upper SES group<br />
performed significantly better than those from both the middle and lower SES groups. On<br />
the performance scale and GQ, the upper SES group scored significantly higher than the<br />
middle and lower SES groups, and the middle SES group scored significantly higher than<br />
the lower SES group. Hence, Allan (1988) was of the opinion that socio-economic status be<br />
taken into account in the interpretation of the Scales.<br />
Allan (1992) completed a comparative study on the performance of South African<br />
normal pre-school children on the Griffiths Scales. The study was aimed at extending<br />
previous research findings, by comparing the performance of South African Black, Coloured,<br />
Indian and White children on the Griffiths Scales. The sample (N = 200) consisted of<br />
children between 5 and 6 years of age. The applicability of the present British norms for<br />
South African children from the different cultural groups was also investigated. Furthermore,<br />
the extent to which the subject variables of gender, language and SES influence the test<br />
performance of these children, was investigated. An analysis of the performance of children<br />
from the four cultural groups on the items of the individual scales, was also conducted in an<br />
attempt to identify culturally-loaded items. With regards to the Hearing and Speech Scale,<br />
the results indicated that no consistent, significantly higher scores were found for children<br />
from a specific cultural groups. There were no significant differences between the cultural<br />
groups with respect to the General Quotient (GQ) and to their performance on the<br />
Personal-Social scale (BQ) and the Practical-Reasoning scale (FQ). With respect to the<br />
other four individual scales, the Coloured and Black groups did not differ significantly from<br />
each other. However, their performance differed significantly from that of the Indian and<br />
White groups. There were also significant differences in the performance of the Indian and<br />
White groups with respect to the latter four individual scales. There were no significant<br />
differences in the test performance of English- and Afrikaans- speaking Coloured children.<br />
However, the only individual scale on which White English-speaking children scored<br />
significantly higher, was on the Hearing and Speech Scale. This finding does not