nicole kotras masters thesis
nicole kotras masters thesis
nicole kotras masters thesis
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
34<br />
languages are usually successful. ... The large picture probably needs updating and varying<br />
for different cultures" (page not numbered). Regarding the large picture (used in Scale CQ),<br />
when the child is asked to name 6 or more objects in the large picture [C.IV.I]. Huntley<br />
(1994) added,<br />
"I always struggle to get much out of the pictures. Children no longer seem to look at such drawings, or<br />
perhaps it is the 1950's style that is outdated. If the picture was full of dinosaurs, turtles and pizza, we<br />
would probably get sentences out of two and a half year olds !" (page not numbered).<br />
Huntley (1996) compared the scores of children (N = 665) living in urban areas (n =<br />
488) and rural areas (n = 177) on the Griffiths Scales. He found that the children in the rural<br />
areas scored significantly lower than those in urban areas, across all areas of development.<br />
The Personal-Social and Hearing and Speech Scales were the most highly significant.<br />
Preliminary to the revision of the Extended Griffiths Scales, an international survey<br />
regarding the strengths and weaknesses of the Scale was conducted among the users of<br />
the test (Luiz, et. al., 1995). A number of problematic items which the users of the Scale<br />
perceived to be culturally biased and non-contemporaneous were identified. Pertaining<br />
specifically to the Hearing and Speech Scale, it was clearly indicated that the revision of<br />
certain items is needed. The 20 small pictures and the large picture were identified (See<br />
Table 2). The findings of this survey, together with the afore-mentioned studies, have been<br />
utilized in the revision of the 20 small pictures and large picture of the Hearing and Speech<br />
Scale.<br />
Regarding research completed at both a national and international level on the use of<br />
the Griffiths Scales, their contribution has unquestionably been invaluable. The Scales have<br />
been utilized in case studies (e.g., Krige, 1988; Luiz, 1988a, 1988b), correlational studies<br />
(e.g., Heimes, 1983; Lombard, 1989; Luiz, 1988c; Mothuloe, 1990; Stewart, 1997; Worsfold,<br />
1993), normative studies (e.g., Allan, 1988; Allan, 1992; Bhamjee, 1991) and validity studies<br />
(e.g., Luiz, et. al., 1995). Furthermore, their use has demonstrated the essential role that the<br />
Scales have fulfilled in the assessment of South African children of all cultural and<br />
socio-economic groups. However, an individual's performance on the Griffiths Scales is<br />
influenced by both social and cultural factors. Luiz (1994) reports social and cultural factors<br />
to be more influential on verbal items, for example with the large picture and the small<br />
picture-card depicting a flag (from Scale CQ). With special emphasis on the Hearing and<br />
Speech Scale, the influence of social and cultural factors results in the questioning of the