10.08.2013 Views

Het volume van chirurgische ingrepen en de impact ervan op ... - KCE

Het volume van chirurgische ingrepen en de impact ervan op ... - KCE

Het volume van chirurgische ingrepen en de impact ervan op ... - KCE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>KCE</strong> Reports 113 Volume Outcome 181<br />

RELATION BETWEEN SURGEON VOLUME AND REVISION RATE AT 18<br />

MONTHS<br />

The effects from the Cox pr<strong>op</strong>ortional hazards mo<strong>de</strong>l, with revision rate at 18 months<br />

as <strong>de</strong>p<strong>en</strong>d<strong>en</strong>t variable, are pres<strong>en</strong>ted in Table 7.16. Low <strong>volume</strong> surgeons and medium<br />

<strong>volume</strong> surgeons have a slightly higher revision rate wh<strong>en</strong> compared to high <strong>volume</strong><br />

surgeons: hazard ratio and 95%CI 1.213 (0.641, 2.295) for low <strong>volume</strong> compared to<br />

high <strong>volume</strong> and 1.156 (0.782, 1.709) for medium <strong>volume</strong> compared to high <strong>volume</strong>,<br />

respectively.<br />

Table 7.16: Total hip arthr<strong>op</strong>lasty: Results of regression: hazard ratio of<br />

surgeon <strong>volume</strong> category on revision rate at 18 months<br />

Mo<strong>de</strong>l without adjustm<strong>en</strong>t for case mix Effect1 95% CI<br />

Volume: low-<strong>volume</strong> (20 THR)<br />

1.221 0.648 2.302<br />

Medium-<strong>volume</strong> versus high–<strong>volume</strong> surgeon 1.148 0.779 1.693<br />

Mo<strong>de</strong>l with adjustm<strong>en</strong>t for case mix Effect 1 95% CI<br />

Volume: low-<strong>volume</strong> (20 THR)<br />

1.213 0.641 2.295<br />

Medium-<strong>volume</strong> versus high–<strong>volume</strong> surgeon 1.156 0.782 1.709<br />

Hazard Ratio 95% CI<br />

Sex (male vs. female) 1.145 0.865 1.516<br />

Age (increase of 1 year) 0.988 0.976 1.001<br />

Charlson score (increase of 1 category) 0.968 0.742 1.264<br />

715 vs. other PDX 2.034 0.507 8.163<br />

733 vs. other PDX 2.814 0.667 11.868<br />

1 Hazard ratio of <strong>volume</strong> category of surgeon on revision within 18 months<br />

7.1.7 Discussion<br />

7.1.7.1 External validation of the <strong>de</strong>finition of the procedure<br />

The external validation of our <strong>de</strong>finition process is based on the data from the Alliance<br />

of Christian Sickness Funds in which a total of 17 485 total hip replacem<strong>en</strong>ts were<br />

reported in Belgium in 1998. 312, 313 This number was obtained by extrapolation of the<br />

claims data from the Christian Sickness Funds for the whole of Belgium. It inclu<strong>de</strong>d<br />

elective and emerg<strong>en</strong>cy THR and should therefore be compared with the 20 267 stays<br />

selected on the basis of NIHDI procedure co<strong>de</strong>s (see Table 5.2 on page 46). The<br />

Christian Sickness Funds m<strong>en</strong>tioned a yearly increase of 4.5% of the number of elective<br />

THR and of 2% of the emerg<strong>en</strong>cy THR, in Belgium, in the period 1990-1998. Wh<strong>en</strong> such<br />

a yearly increase is tak<strong>en</strong> into account, their data become very similar to ours.<br />

7.1.7.2 Summarized results of literature review<br />

The systematic literature search id<strong>en</strong>tified six systematic reviews in which the VOA for<br />

THR was studied. 1, 5, 59, 60, 62, 64 In all, these systematic reviews id<strong>en</strong>tified 20 primary<br />

studies of which 4 were published betwe<strong>en</strong> 2001 and 2004, 311, 314-316 and 7 betwe<strong>en</strong><br />

1995 and 1999. 197, 309, 317-321 These articles were complem<strong>en</strong>ted with a limited number of<br />

primary studies that were retrieved through the refer<strong>en</strong>ce lists of the original 20<br />

312, 322, 323<br />

primary studies and through a search of grey literature.<br />

On the basis of all six systematic reviews, it was conclu<strong>de</strong>d in Chapter 2 (see Table 2.2<br />

on page 19) that there were conflicting results in relation to the <strong>volume</strong>-outcome<br />

association betwe<strong>en</strong> hospital <strong>volume</strong> and in-hospital mortality. The term “conflicting<br />

results” is used because there is a mix of primary studies that indicate an inverse<br />

relation with <strong>volume</strong>, others that indicate no relation, and others that indicate a direct<br />

relation with <strong>volume</strong> (which means that an increase in <strong>volume</strong> is associated with higher<br />

mortality). It was emphasised, however, that each systematic review had studied only a<br />

very limited number of primary studies.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!