Het volume van chirurgische ingrepen en de impact ervan op ... - KCE

More documents

Recommendations

Info

230 Volume Outcome KCE reports 113 228. Polednak AP. Hospital volume and survival of breast cancer patients in Connecticut. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(6):946-7. 229. Sainsbury R, Haward B, Rider L, Johnston C, Round C. Influence of clinician workload and patterns of treatment on survival from breast cancer. Lancet. 1995;345(8960):1265-70. 230. Sloan FA, Perrin JM, Valvona J. In-hospital mortality of surgical patients: is there an empiric basis for standard setting? Surgery. 1986;99(4):446-54. 231. Bouche G, Migeot V, Mathoulin-Pelissier S, Salamon R, Ingrand P. Breast cancer surgery: do all patients want to go to high-volume hospitals? Surgery. 2008;143(6):699-705. 232. Ingram DM, McEvoy SP, Byrne MJ, Fritschi L, Joseph DJ, Jamrozik K. Surgical caseload and outcomes for women with invasive breast cancer treated in Western Australia. Breast. 2005;14(1):11-7. 233. Nomura E, Tsukuma H, Ajiki W, Ishikawa O, Oshima A. Population-based study of the relationship between hospital surgical volume and 10-year survival of breast cancer patients in Osaka, Japan. Cancer Sci. 2006;97(7):618-22. 234. 26 APRIL 2007. - Koninklijk besluit houdende vaststelling van de normen waaraan het gespecialiseerd oncologisch zorgprogramma voor borstkanker moet voldoen om te worden erkend, B.S. 20 juli 2007. 235. Remacle A, Mertens R. Borstkanker. Brussel: februari 2007. Themadossier CM Available from: http://www.cm.be/cm-tridion/nl/100/Resources/CM%20Dossier%20Borstkanker%20def_tcm24- 14394.pdf 236. Bach PB, Cramer LD, Schrag D, Downey RJ, Gelfand SE, Begg CB. The influence of hospital volume on survival after resection for lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(3):181-8. 237. Sioris T, Sihvo E, Sankila R, Salo J. Effect of surgical volume and hospital type on outcome in non-small cell lung cancer surgery: a Finnish population-based study. Lung Cancer. 2008;59(1):119-25. 238. Lababede O, Meziane MA, Rice TW. TNM staging of lung cancer: a quick reference chart. Chest. 1999;115(1):233-5. 239. Romano PS, Mark DH. Patient and hospital characteristics related to in-hospital mortality after lung cancer resection. Chest. 1992;101(5):1332-7. 240. Silvestri GA, Handy J, Lackland D, Corley E, Reed CE. Specialists achieve better outcomes than generalists for lung cancer surgery. Chest. 1998;114(3):675-80. 241. Freixinet JL, Julia-Serda G, Rodriguez PM, Santana NB, de Castro FR, Fiuza MD, et al. Hospital volume: operative morbidity, mortality and survival in thoracotomy for lung cancer. A Spanish multicenter study of 2994 cases. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006;29(1):20-5. 242. Li WW, de Mol BA. Hospital volume as a quality standard in lung cancer surgery: an unfinished debate. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85(5):1840-1; author reply 1-2. 243. Lien YC, Huang MT, Lin HC. Association between surgeon and hospital volume and in-hospital fatalities after lung cancer resections: the experience of an Asian country. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83(5):1837-43. 244. Osada H, Yamakoshi E. Hospital volume and surgical outcomes of lung cancer in Japan. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;55(9):360-5. 245. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Stroke: the diagnosis and initial management of acute stroke and transient ischaemic attack.(Clinical guideline 68). 2008. Available from: http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/CG68FullGuideline.pdf 246. Jacques J, Gillain D, Fecher F, Van De Sande S, Vrijens F, Ramaekers D, et al. Studie naar praktijkverschillen bij electieve chirurgische ingrepen in België. Good Clinical Practice (GCP). Brussel: Federaal Kenniscentrum voor de gezondheidszorg (KCE); 2006. KCE reports 42A (D/2006/10.273/45) 247. Bonneux L, Cleemput I, Ramaekers D. Endovasculaire behandeling van Carotisstenose. Health Technology Assessment (HTA). Brussel: Federaal Kenniscentrum voor de Gezondheidszorg (KCE); 2005 April. KCE reports 13A (D/2005/10.273/09) Available from: 248. http://kce.fgov.be/Download.aspx?ID=264 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Rockville, MD.;c February 2006. Inpatient Quality Indicators Overview. AHRQ Quality Indicators. Available from: http://www.qualityindicators.ahrq.gov/iqi_overview.htm
KCE Reports 113 Volume Outcome 231 249. The Leapfrog Group [cited 21/10/2008]. The Leapfrog Group. Available from: http://www.leapfroggroup.org/ 250. Personal Communication by Barbara A. Rudolph, Director Leaps and Measures, The Leapfrog Group. In; 24/10/2008. 251. Roddy SP, O'Donnell TF, Jr., Wilson AL, Estes JM, Mackey WC. The Balanced Budget Act: potential implications for the practice of vascular surgery. J Vasc Surg. 2000;31(2):227-36. 252. Peck C, Peck J, Peck A. Comparison of carotid endarterectomy at high- and low-volume hospitals. Am J Surg. 2001;181(5):450-3. 253. O'Neill L, Lanska DJ, Hartz A. Surgeon characteristics associated with mortality and morbidity following carotid endarterectomy. Neurology. 2000;55(6):773-81. 254. Middleton S, Donnelly N. Outcomes of carotid endarterectomy: how does the Australian state of New South Wales compare with international benchmarks? J Vasc Surg. 2002;36(1):62-9. 255. Harthun NL, Kongable GL, Baglioni AJ, Meakem TD, Kron IL. Examination of sex as an independent risk factor for adverse events after carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg. 2005;41(2):223-30. 256. Hannan EL, Popp AJ, Feustel P, Halm E, Bernardini G, Waldman J, et al. Association of surgical specialty and processes of care with patient outcomes for carotid endarterectomy. Stroke. 2001;32(12):2890-7. 257. Feasby TE, Quan H, Ghali WA. Hospital and surgeon determinants of carotid endarterectomy outcomes. Arch Neurol. 2002;59(12):1877-81. 258. Dardik A, Bowman HM, Gordon TA, Hsieh G, Perler BA. Impact of race on the outcome of carotid endarterectomy: a population-based analysis of 9,842 recent elective procedures. Ann Surg. 2000;232(5):704-9. 259. Cowan JA, Jr., Dimick JB, Thompson BG, Stanley JC, Upchurch GR, Jr. Surgeon volume as an indicator of outcomes after carotid endarterectomy: an effect independent of specialty practice and hospital volume. J Am Coll Surg. 2002;195(6):814-21. 260. Mas JL, Chatellier G, Beyssen B, Branchereau A, Moulin T, Becquemin JP, et al. Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(16):1660-71. 261. Yadav JS, Wholey MH, Kuntz RE, Fayad P, Katzen BT, Mishkel GJ, et al. Protected carotidartery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(15):1493- 501. 262. American Heart Association [cited 30/10/2008]. Surgery and Other Medical Procedures. Available from: http://www.americanheart.org/presenter.jhtml?identifier=123 263. Sellke FW, DiMaio JM, Caplan LR, Ferguson TB, Gardner TJ, Hiratzka LF, et al. Comparing onpump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: numerous studies but few conclusions: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association council on cardiovascular surgery and anesthesia in collaboration with the interdisciplinary working group on quality of care and outcomes research. Circulation. 2005;111(21):2858-64. 264. New York State Department of Health [updated 01/10/2008; cited 21/10/2008]. New York State Hospital Profile. Available from: http://hospitals.nyhealth.gov/index.php 265. Neyt M, Van Brabandt H, Devriese S, Mahieu J, De Ridder A, De Graeve D, et al. Drug Eluting Stents in Belgium: Health Technology Assessment. Brussels: Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (KCE); 2007. D/2007/10.273/49 Available from: http://kce.fgov.be/index_nl.aspx?SGREF=5272&CREF=10069 266. Shahian DM, Silverstein T, Lovett AF, Wolf RE, Normand S-LT. Comparison of clinical and administrative data sources for hospital coronary artery bypass graft surgery report cards. Circulation. 2007;115(12):1518-27. 267. Brown PP, Mack MJ, Simon AW, Battaglia SL, Tarkington LG, Culler SD, et al. Comparing clinical outcomes in high-volume and low-volume off-pump coronary bypass operation programs. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72(3):S1009-15. 268. Nallamothu BK, Saint S, Ramsey SD, Hofer TP, Vijan S, Eagle KA. The role of hospital volume in coronary artery bypass grafting: is more always better? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38(7):1923- 30. 269. Carey JS, Robertson JM, Misbach GA, Fisher AL. Relationship of hospital volume to outcome in cardiac surgery programs in California. Am Surg. 2003;69(1):63-8.
Page 1 and 2:
Het volume van chirurgische ingrepe
Page 3 and 4:
Het volume van chirurgische ingrepe
Page 5 and 6:
KCE reports 113A Volume - Uitkomst
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
KCE Reports 113 Volume Outcome 1 Sc
Page 19 and 20:
KCE Reports 113 Volume Outcome 3 6.
Page 21 and 22:
KCE Reports 113 Volume Outcome 5 Ab
Page 23 and 24:
KCE Reports 113 Volume Outcome 7 2
Page 25 and 26:
KCE Reports 113 Volume Outcome 9 5.
Page 27 and 28:
KCE Reports 113 Volume Outcome 11 O
Page 29 and 30:
KCE Reports 113 Volume Outcome 13 F
Page 31 and 32:
KCE Reports 113 Volume Outcome 15 T
Page 33 and 34:
KCE Reports 113 Volume Outcome 17 P
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
KCE Reports 113 Volume Outcome 33 H
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
KCE Reports 113 Volume Outcome 57 R
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
KCE Reports 113 Volume Outcome 61 C
Page 79 and 80:
KCE Reports 113 Volume Outcome 63 A
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
KCE Reports 113 Volume Outcome 77 D
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
KCE Reports 113 Volume Outcome 93 R
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
KCE Reports 113 Volume Outcome 97 V
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
KCE Reports 113 Volume Outcome 101
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196: KCE Reports 113 Volume Outcome 179
Page 245: KCE Reports 113 Volume Outcome 229
Page 253 and 254: This page is left intentionally bla
Page 255 and 256: KCE reports 1. Effectiviteit en kos
Page 257 and 258: 73. Financiering van het zorgprogra
show all

Het volume van chirurgische ingrepen en de impact ervan op ... - KCE

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?