10.08.2013 Views

Download the supplement (208 p.) - KCE

Download the supplement (208 p.) - KCE

Download the supplement (208 p.) - KCE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>KCE</strong> reports vol. 40 APPENDICES Physio<strong>the</strong>rapy 117<br />

1.1.2 Questionnaire<br />

Questionnaire development<br />

The design of <strong>the</strong> survey has been achieved in collaboration with two physio<strong>the</strong>rapists associations, namely<br />

<strong>the</strong> AKRW (Association des Kinésithérapeutes de la Région de Wavre) and <strong>the</strong> WVVK (Wetenschappelijke<br />

Vereniging voor Vlaamse Kinesi<strong>the</strong>rapeuten). A French first version of <strong>the</strong> questionnaire has been developed<br />

by <strong>the</strong> team of <strong>the</strong> Université catholique de Louvain and <strong>the</strong> Federal Health Care Knowledge Centre (<strong>KCE</strong>).<br />

This version has been submitted to 15 ambulatory physio<strong>the</strong>rapists of <strong>the</strong> AKRW. They were asked to fill in<br />

<strong>the</strong> questionnaire as well as a grid to assess its relevance and layout. A meeting was subsequently organised to<br />

discuss <strong>the</strong> physio<strong>the</strong>rapists comments/suggestions. The questionnaire was <strong>the</strong>n adapted and translated in<br />

Dutch. This version was submitted to ambulatory physio<strong>the</strong>rapists of <strong>the</strong> WVVK and discussed following <strong>the</strong><br />

same procedure as described above. The French and Dutch final versions of <strong>the</strong> questionnaire are respectively<br />

presented in <strong>the</strong> appendixes 4A and 4B.<br />

Nature of <strong>the</strong> collected information<br />

An initial page presented <strong>the</strong> purpose of <strong>the</strong> questionnaire and <strong>the</strong> guaranty that <strong>the</strong> anonymity of <strong>the</strong><br />

respondents would be preserved. The questionnaire itself collected information of several types:<br />

Some demographic information of <strong>the</strong> respondents: physio<strong>the</strong>rapist s post code (to determine <strong>the</strong><br />

Belgian province), age, sex, and date of <strong>the</strong> degree in physio<strong>the</strong>rapy and rehabilitation.<br />

The sessions performed by <strong>the</strong> physio<strong>the</strong>rapists during one working day (from Monday to Friday).<br />

The day was randomly imposed on each respondent to avoid that <strong>the</strong> physio<strong>the</strong>rapists choose a day<br />

with a lot of sessions or, conversely, with few sessions. Moreover, an interaction effect between days<br />

and type of pathology may be present as <strong>the</strong> Monday, Wednesday, and Friday are preferentially kept<br />

to conditions requiring a treatment 3 times a week. For each session, <strong>the</strong> following information was<br />

requested: patient s age and sex, Belgian nomenclature code of <strong>the</strong> session, and reason(s) for<br />

treatment.<br />

The treatment modalities applied for five common conditions requiring physical <strong>the</strong>rapy as part of<br />

treatment. The following conditions were selected: acute low back pain (without radiating pain), total<br />

knee replacement, hemiplegia/hemiparesis, gait disorders in elderly people, and bronchiolitis in infants<br />

and children. These five conditions were selected as (1) <strong>the</strong>y are, a priori, frequently encountered in<br />

ambulatory physio<strong>the</strong>rapy (bronchiolitis is probaly less common than o<strong>the</strong>r conditions but was<br />

never<strong>the</strong>less added to include a paediatric condition), (2) <strong>the</strong>y include different types of pathologies<br />

(low back pain = musculoskeletal condition / C list; total knee replacement = orthopaedic condition /<br />

FA list; hemiplegia/hemiparesis = neurological condition / E list; gait disorders in elderly people =<br />

general condition / FB list; bronchiolitis = respiratory condition / C list), and (3) <strong>the</strong>y cover different<br />

age brackets (from infants and children with bronchiolitis to elderly people with gait disorders). Note<br />

that separate pages were provided for each condition. Only physio<strong>the</strong>rapists who have treated, last<br />

week, at least one patient suffering from <strong>the</strong> specified condition were asked to select among a preestablished<br />

list <strong>the</strong> treatment modalitie(s) applied for <strong>the</strong> last patient seen for this condition. The<br />

respondents had <strong>the</strong> possibility to specify <strong>the</strong> electrophysio<strong>the</strong>rapeutic modalities and o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

treatment modalities not included in <strong>the</strong> pre-established list. They were also asked to indicate <strong>the</strong><br />

patient s age and sex as well as <strong>the</strong> delay between <strong>the</strong> beginning of his/her condition and <strong>the</strong> beginning<br />

of <strong>the</strong> treatment by <strong>the</strong> physio<strong>the</strong>rapist.<br />

The clinical tests and functional assessment tools used to determine <strong>the</strong> evolution of patients suffering<br />

from <strong>the</strong> five conditions described just above. All physio<strong>the</strong>rapists were asked to select among a preestablished<br />

list <strong>the</strong> functional tests that <strong>the</strong>y are using for each specified condition. The respondents<br />

had <strong>the</strong> possibility to specify functional tests not included in <strong>the</strong> pre-established list.<br />

The key element on which <strong>the</strong> physio<strong>the</strong>rapists go to establish <strong>the</strong>ir treatment planning. The<br />

suggested responses were <strong>the</strong> medical prescription, <strong>the</strong> number of prescribed sessions, or <strong>the</strong><br />

patient s functional status on <strong>the</strong> basis of a physio<strong>the</strong>rapeutic assessment.<br />

The knowledge / non-knowledge of <strong>the</strong> concepts of <strong>the</strong> International Classification of Functioning,<br />

Disability, and Health (ICF) proposed by <strong>the</strong> World Health Organization and <strong>the</strong> use / non-use of <strong>the</strong><br />

ICF concepts in <strong>the</strong> physio<strong>the</strong>rapeutic practice (e.g., to define <strong>the</strong> objectives of <strong>the</strong> treatment or to<br />

determine <strong>the</strong> patient s evolution).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!