Download the supplement (208 p.) - KCE
Download the supplement (208 p.) - KCE
Download the supplement (208 p.) - KCE
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>KCE</strong> reports vol. 40 APPENDICES Physio<strong>the</strong>rapy 159<br />
Table 9 Acute low back pain: treatment modalities applied by Belgian ambulatory physio<strong>the</strong>rapists and evidence-based literature<br />
Treatment modality<br />
Frequency<br />
(proportion<br />
± accuracy)<br />
Electrophysio<strong>the</strong>rapy 39 ± 6%<br />
Spinal manipulations 38 ± 6%<br />
Type of<br />
evidence<br />
Conflicting<br />
evidence<br />
(only chronic<br />
LBP)<br />
?<br />
Evidence<br />
against<br />
(weak)<br />
?<br />
Evidence<br />
against<br />
(weak)<br />
Evidence for<br />
(moderate)<br />
but not<br />
safety<br />
Evidence available in <strong>the</strong> literature on physio<strong>the</strong>rapy of acute low back pain (LBP)<br />
TENS: There is conflicting evidence that TENS as an isolated intervention is effective in<br />
patients with chronic low back pain. Some studies support a limited effect of TENS in reducing<br />
pain and improving function. However, more studies of sufficient power are needed before<br />
definitive conclusions can be drawn.<br />
Ionization / inteRFTrential currents: There is very little evidence available in <strong>the</strong> literature<br />
on <strong>the</strong> effectiveness of electro<strong>the</strong>rapy (ionization, inteRFTrential currents ). The<br />
effectiveness of such physical <strong>the</strong>rapy modalities remains unknown. Such treatment modalities<br />
should thus not be recommended.<br />
Ultrasounds: There is weak evidence that ultrasounds are ineffective to treat low back<br />
pain. However very little good quality studies on this topic are available in <strong>the</strong> literature. Based<br />
on <strong>the</strong> available evidence, ultrasounds should not be recommended.<br />
Electromagnetic waves: There is no evidence available in <strong>the</strong> literature on <strong>the</strong> effectiveness<br />
of electromagnetic waves.<br />
Laser: There is weak evidence that laser <strong>the</strong>rapy is ineffective to treat low back pain.<br />
However very little good quality studies on this topic are available in <strong>the</strong> literature. Based on<br />
<strong>the</strong> available evidence, laser <strong>the</strong>rapy should not be recommended.<br />
There is moderate evidence that spinal manipulations are more effective than no treatment<br />
to treat low back pain.<br />
There is moderate evidence that spinal manipulations are as effective as more traditional<br />
physio<strong>the</strong>rapeutic treatments.<br />
There is little and sometimes conflicting evidence on safety of manipulative treatment for<br />
low back pain. Minor secondary effects (headache, fatigue sensation, general transient<br />
unwellness state and/or pain enhancement) seem frequent and self-limiting. Major<br />
complications (stroke due to vertebro-basilar artery dissection, herniated discs, cauda equina<br />
syndrome) seem very uncommon but potentially dramatic.