10.08.2013 Views

Download the supplement (208 p.) - KCE

Download the supplement (208 p.) - KCE

Download the supplement (208 p.) - KCE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>KCE</strong> reports vol. 40 APPENDICES Physio<strong>the</strong>rapy 159<br />

Table 9 Acute low back pain: treatment modalities applied by Belgian ambulatory physio<strong>the</strong>rapists and evidence-based literature<br />

Treatment modality<br />

Frequency<br />

(proportion<br />

± accuracy)<br />

Electrophysio<strong>the</strong>rapy 39 ± 6%<br />

Spinal manipulations 38 ± 6%<br />

Type of<br />

evidence<br />

Conflicting<br />

evidence<br />

(only chronic<br />

LBP)<br />

?<br />

Evidence<br />

against<br />

(weak)<br />

?<br />

Evidence<br />

against<br />

(weak)<br />

Evidence for<br />

(moderate)<br />

but not<br />

safety<br />

Evidence available in <strong>the</strong> literature on physio<strong>the</strong>rapy of acute low back pain (LBP)<br />

TENS: There is conflicting evidence that TENS as an isolated intervention is effective in<br />

patients with chronic low back pain. Some studies support a limited effect of TENS in reducing<br />

pain and improving function. However, more studies of sufficient power are needed before<br />

definitive conclusions can be drawn.<br />

Ionization / inteRFTrential currents: There is very little evidence available in <strong>the</strong> literature<br />

on <strong>the</strong> effectiveness of electro<strong>the</strong>rapy (ionization, inteRFTrential currents ). The<br />

effectiveness of such physical <strong>the</strong>rapy modalities remains unknown. Such treatment modalities<br />

should thus not be recommended.<br />

Ultrasounds: There is weak evidence that ultrasounds are ineffective to treat low back<br />

pain. However very little good quality studies on this topic are available in <strong>the</strong> literature. Based<br />

on <strong>the</strong> available evidence, ultrasounds should not be recommended.<br />

Electromagnetic waves: There is no evidence available in <strong>the</strong> literature on <strong>the</strong> effectiveness<br />

of electromagnetic waves.<br />

Laser: There is weak evidence that laser <strong>the</strong>rapy is ineffective to treat low back pain.<br />

However very little good quality studies on this topic are available in <strong>the</strong> literature. Based on<br />

<strong>the</strong> available evidence, laser <strong>the</strong>rapy should not be recommended.<br />

There is moderate evidence that spinal manipulations are more effective than no treatment<br />

to treat low back pain.<br />

There is moderate evidence that spinal manipulations are as effective as more traditional<br />

physio<strong>the</strong>rapeutic treatments.<br />

There is little and sometimes conflicting evidence on safety of manipulative treatment for<br />

low back pain. Minor secondary effects (headache, fatigue sensation, general transient<br />

unwellness state and/or pain enhancement) seem frequent and self-limiting. Major<br />

complications (stroke due to vertebro-basilar artery dissection, herniated discs, cauda equina<br />

syndrome) seem very uncommon but potentially dramatic.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!