Download the supplement (208 p.) - KCE

More documents

Recommendations

Info

120 APPENDICES Physiotherapy KCE reports vol. B West- Vlaanderen Bruxelles- Brussels Brabant Wallon Oost- Vlaanderen Hainaut Antwerpen Vlaams-Brabant Namur Limburg Liège Luxembourg Respondents (n = 367) 4% 10% 4% 10% 14% 5% 6% 11% Non-respondents (n = 1633) 4% 9% 4% 9% Figure 4.1 Distribution of physiotherapists according to Belgian provinces for respondents (n = 367) and nonrespondents (n = 1633). 1.2.2. Pathologies treated in Belgian ambulatory physiotherapy Pathologies treated in Belgian ambulatory physiotherapy were recorded by asking the respondents to indicate all sessions performed by them during one working day. Reason(s) for treatment (i.e., pathology/ies treated during physiotherapeutic sessions), age and sex of the patients treated during these sessions, and Belgian nomenclature code of each session were recorded. Overall, 5300 sessions were recorded in the questionnaire. However, it was not always possible to interpret the pathologies indicated by the physiotherapists because some pathologies were unreadable or too vague. As a result, only 5170 sessions were available for analysis, that is, an average of 14 sessions by respondents. The main reasons for treatment (RFT) in Belgian ambulatory physiotherapy are presented in Table 4.2. The RFT are sorted, from top to bottom, in order of decreasing frequency. Only RFT mentioned in at least 100 out of the 5170 sessions examined in the questionnaire were considered. Eleven RFT met this requirement and represented together 48.82% of the entire set of examined sessions. Most of these RFT refer to musculoskeletal disorders (i.e., low back pain, arthrosis and polyarthrosis, cervicalgia, enthesopathy and tendinitis, adhesive capsulitis of shoulder). Other common RFT include neurological (hemiplegia/hemiparesis and stroke/cerebrovascular disorders, Parkinson), orthopaedic (orthopaedic joint implants), general (gait disorders), cardiovascular (lymphoedema and edema), and respiratory (chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases) disorders. Interestingly, four of the five conditions a priori selected in the questionnaire to study treatment modalities applied by Belgian physiotherapists and functional tests used in their practice were counted among the main RFT. They represented together 21.62% of the entire set of examined sessions. Only bronchiolitis in infants and children was not included in the main RFT and explains just 0.03% (n = 14) of the entire set of examined sessions. It is also interesting to note that the distribution of chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (COPD) varies according to the Belgian provinces (see Appendix 4.G). Indeed, COPD are more common in Walloon area than in Flanders and Brussels, especially in the Hainaut (37% of the 137 encounters with COPD) and Liege (14% of the 137 encounters with COPD) provinces in which there were a lot of coalmines and heavy industries. 13% 5% 6% 11% 13% 7% 3% 13% 8% 11% 16% 2% 15% 14%
KCE reports vol. 40 APPENDICES Physiotherapy 121 Table 2 Main reasons for treatment in Belgian ambulatory physiotherapy Reason for treatment (when n 100 out of 5170 sessions) Number Proportion* Hemiplegia/hemiparesis and stroke/cerebrovascular disorders 431 8.34 ± 0.75% Low back pain 332 6.42 ± 0.67% Presence of orthopaedic joint implants 286 5.53 ± 0.62% Total hip replacement 134 2.59 ± 0.43% Total knee replacement 120 2.32 ± 0.41% Other orthopaedic joint implants 032 0.62 ± 0.21% Arthrosis and polyarthrosis 245 4.74 ± 0.58% Gait disorders 235 4.55 ± 0.57% Cervicalgia 204 3.95 ± 0.53% Lymphoedema and edema 192 3.71 ± 0.52% Postmastectomy lymphoedema 104 2.01 ± 0.38% Other lymphoedema and edema 088 1.70 ± 0.35% Parkinson 174 3.37 ± 0.49% Enthesopathy and tendinitis 169 3.27 ± 0.48% Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (COPD) 137 2.65 ± 0.44% Adhesive capsulitis of shoulder 119 2.30 ± 0.41% Other 2646 51.18 ± 1.36%0 Total 5170 100 ± 0.00% * Proportion ± accuracy corresponding to the 95% confidence interval Pathologies treated during physiotherapeutic sessions were also classified according to two well-known classifications: The International Classification of Primary Care 2 nd Edition (ICPC-2) proposed by the Wonca International Classification Committee (WICC) (World Organisation of National Colleges, Academic & Academic Associations of General Practitioners / Family Physicians 1998). The International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10 th Revision (ICD-10) proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO) (World Health Organisation 1992). The ICPC-2 was primarily designed for the classification of patient reasons for treatment by the primary care provider at the time of consultation. This classification is based on body systems, following the principle that localization has precedence over aetiology in primary care. Indeed, many of the conditions treated in primary care are vague, can sometimes only be diagnosed in terms of symptoms/complaints, and are not necessarily related to an underlying disease (e.g., gait disorders in elderly people). Contrary to the ICPC-2, ICD-10 has an emphasis on disease in terms of its aetiology, pathology, and morphology. The ICD-10 is the oldest and most widely recognized classification of diseases and presents the advantage of international recognition, aiding comparability of data from different countries. Physiotherapeutic sessions during one working day according to the International Classification of Primary Care 2 nd Edition (ICPC-2) One physiotherapeutic session may be used to treat more than one condition when co-morbidity exists. In such situation, the session was divided into the number of RFT/conditions that are treated during this session if they belong to different ICPC-2 chapters. As a result, the 5170 examined sessions increased up to 5416 reasons for treatment (RFT). The number and the proportion of RFT according to each of the 17 ICPC-2 chapters are illustrated in Figure 4.2. Most of the pathologies treated in Belgium during ambulatory physiotherapeutic sessions refer to musculoskeletal (49.78 1.33%) and neurological (21.38 1.09%) disorders.
Page 1 and 2:
Functional status of the patient: a
Page 3 and 4:
Functional status of the patient: a
Page 5 and 6:
KCE reports vol. 40 APPENDICES Phys
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
KCE reports vol.40 APPENDICES Physi
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
5 KCE reports vol.40 APPENDICES Phy
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72: KCE reports vol. 40 APPENDICES Phys
Page 121: KCE reports vol. 40 APPENDICES Phys
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
show all

Download the supplement (208 p.) - KCE

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?