12.08.2013 Views

Preface - Electronic Poetry Center

Preface - Electronic Poetry Center

Preface - Electronic Poetry Center

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

From: Bob Perelman<br />

Subject: Government by Irritation [op-ed, Philadelphia Enquirer]<br />

… Government by irritation: it’s one of the dominant political modes of our<br />

day. Taking their cue from talk show hosts, politicians try to topple their<br />

opponents by unleashing discontent. These days the NEA serves as a handy<br />

source of annoyance if not outrage: a few well-publicized examples of<br />

troublesome art have, over the last few years, been able to furnish a great<br />

supply of instant political energy.<br />

It’s not easy to argue against such energy. The value of art is not always<br />

instantly apparent–and at the same the difficulties art brings with it are much<br />

more likely to be perceived at a glance. The latest remarks by senators that the<br />

NEA be abolished unless it supports "family values" show how true this is.<br />

Rather than arguing for art that is familiar, obedient and at best ornamental, I<br />

think case that art is valuable to the community precisely because it is not<br />

perfectly predictable or obedient. That will not mean that unruly art is<br />

automatically wonderful. Art is one of the testing grounds between individuals<br />

and the community. The point is that it’s an opportunity for judgment:<br />

members of the community will need to make up their minds. That’s one of the<br />

basic values of art: it can’t be approached dogmatically.<br />

If it’s considered in terms of the federal budget as a whole, the NEA is hardly a<br />

big deal. The federal budget is around a trillion and a half dollars a year; the<br />

NEA budget is $167 million. If my math holds, that means that the NEA takes<br />

up about one ten thousandth of the federal budget. That’s less than the military<br />

spends on marching bands, less than the city of Berlin spends on public art.<br />

To eliminate the NEA would save each American 65 cents a year. Here in<br />

Philadelphia, dance, poetry, the visual arts, theater would all suffer; the gamut<br />

of organizations affected would range from the Institute for Contemporary Art<br />

to the Please Touch Museum, from the Philadelphia Orchestra to the Settlement<br />

Music School. The bigger, more established concerns would take a hit; some of<br />

the smaller organizations might have to close. Those who are out of sympathy<br />

with the arts might think that’s fine: that if a theater company needs a handout<br />

to survive there’s something wrong with it. But to consider the arts in such a<br />

framework is an unfair oversimplification.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!