12.08.2013 Views

Preface - Electronic Poetry Center

Preface - Electronic Poetry Center

Preface - Electronic Poetry Center

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

It begins to sound like the POETICS list is quite varied, with perhaps only a<br />

few subscribers exclusively L= poets. So I’d been given the wrong sense of<br />

what the list was.<br />

I begin to wonder, too, whether the big division proclaimed between the LP<br />

movement and the rest of poetry is really useful. Some of the recent posts<br />

suggest that it isn’t. For after all, poetry using unfamiliar methods of<br />

communication goes back at least to Rimbaud (1870) and Mallarme’ (1880-<br />

1890). Everybody knows about Dada, Modernism, Surrealism, and Black<br />

Mountain. Plus various unclassifiables like Gertrude Stein, Laura Riding,<br />

Bunting and Ashbery. And the Naropa Institute. So I’m not yet certain that LP<br />

has introduced anything that wasn’t already there. If writing nonrepresentationally<br />

is the key, we have to acknowledge that almost none of<br />

Wallace Stevens is representational. If disjunctiveness is the key, then no one<br />

could be more disjunctive than Ashbery. If collage is it, then the Surrealists did<br />

it long ago–ditto for automatic writing. Meanwhile the other poetry, the one<br />

based on narrative, on representing sensory impressions verbally, or providing<br />

philosophical or meditative discourse, was always attentive to experimentation<br />

and used some of the new techniques as well. Just maybe the same situation<br />

obtains today, with some poets fusing the two approaches. My own impression<br />

of Hejinian was that My Life was an autobiographical narrative and therefore at<br />

some level representational; plus a constant intrusion of cognitive<br />

"interference," words used like (metaphor) paint–a kind of alogical interruption<br />

to transparent narrative. Isn’t this a fusion of the two? To use a comparison<br />

from music, "classical" music of this century has again and again borrowed<br />

from jazz–but then so has jazz borrowed from "classical" music over and again.<br />

There’s no Stravinsky without jazz and there’s no Mingus without Stravinsky.<br />

Maybe LANGUAGE poetry really isn’t a separate movement at all, but instead<br />

is just poetry, multisourced and not really describable in simple terms as truly<br />

distinct from the other poetry?<br />

As for signing on to POETICS, I’ll think about it, Maria, it’s just that there are<br />

demands on my time and a mailbox already overloaded with messages from<br />

two other groups.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!