list of contributors - GALA
list of contributors - GALA
list of contributors - GALA
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
4. Legislation: Advertising Code <strong>of</strong> Conduct<br />
Topic: Degrading advertising<br />
When: February 2005<br />
Who: Advertising self-Regulation Association<br />
Where: Spain<br />
What Happened: The Gillette España, S.L. Group filed a claim against an advert that the<br />
company Unilever España, S.A. is responsible for.<br />
In the advert, the voice-over says: “The skin under your arms is very delicate<br />
and depilation can damage it.” This declaration is accompanied by an image<br />
in which we can see a razor passing over gauze, ripping it and causing a hole<br />
therein.<br />
In the plaintiff’s opinion the advert is calumnious to razors, and, therefore,<br />
contrary to Rule 21 <strong>of</strong> the Self-Regulation Code <strong>of</strong> Conduct which establishes<br />
that:<br />
“Advertising should not slander or slight, either implicitly or explicitly, other<br />
companies, activities, products or services. The declarations set down in the<br />
advertising message will not be considered slander if they are exact, true and<br />
relevant. In particular, allusion to the personal circumstances <strong>of</strong> the employer<br />
or his/her company will not be considered relevant.”<br />
Likewise, Gillette España, S.L. understands that the advert violates Rule 5 <strong>of</strong><br />
said Code, which prohibits exploiting the consumers’ fear, alleging that the<br />
advert instills an unjustified fear by identifying the use <strong>of</strong> razors with the risk<br />
<strong>of</strong> suffering quite considerable injuries to the skin.<br />
In its ruling, the Self-Regulation Jury considers that we have a case <strong>of</strong><br />
advertising that is slanderous to razors. In its opinion, the advert images do<br />
not correctly transmit the idea <strong>of</strong> the true effects that depilation has on the<br />
skin. It goes far beyond this, exaggerating its effects and aggressively<br />
representing effects that could be considered devastating for people’s skin.<br />
This idea is reinforced by the declaration that accompanies the images, where<br />
it indicates that depilation can damage the skin.<br />
Nevertheless, the Jury does not consider that the advert infringes Rule 5 <strong>of</strong><br />
the Self-Regulation Code <strong>of</strong> Conduct as it is improbable that the advert<br />
objected to can generate fear or instill consternation among the consumers.<br />
In consequence, the Jury allowed the complaint by Gillette España, S.L. and<br />
declares that the advert infringes the principle <strong>of</strong> non-defamation <strong>of</strong> the Self-<br />
Regulation Code <strong>of</strong> Conduct.<br />
Comments: Although it is illicit to use a certain degree <strong>of</strong> “advertising exaggeration”, it<br />
should not be capable <strong>of</strong> slighting other products or services.