26.10.2013 Views

list of contributors - GALA

list of contributors - GALA

list of contributors - GALA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4. Legislation: Advertising Code <strong>of</strong> Conduct<br />

Topic: Degrading advertising<br />

When: February 2005<br />

Who: Advertising self-Regulation Association<br />

Where: Spain<br />

What Happened: The Gillette España, S.L. Group filed a claim against an advert that the<br />

company Unilever España, S.A. is responsible for.<br />

In the advert, the voice-over says: “The skin under your arms is very delicate<br />

and depilation can damage it.” This declaration is accompanied by an image<br />

in which we can see a razor passing over gauze, ripping it and causing a hole<br />

therein.<br />

In the plaintiff’s opinion the advert is calumnious to razors, and, therefore,<br />

contrary to Rule 21 <strong>of</strong> the Self-Regulation Code <strong>of</strong> Conduct which establishes<br />

that:<br />

“Advertising should not slander or slight, either implicitly or explicitly, other<br />

companies, activities, products or services. The declarations set down in the<br />

advertising message will not be considered slander if they are exact, true and<br />

relevant. In particular, allusion to the personal circumstances <strong>of</strong> the employer<br />

or his/her company will not be considered relevant.”<br />

Likewise, Gillette España, S.L. understands that the advert violates Rule 5 <strong>of</strong><br />

said Code, which prohibits exploiting the consumers’ fear, alleging that the<br />

advert instills an unjustified fear by identifying the use <strong>of</strong> razors with the risk<br />

<strong>of</strong> suffering quite considerable injuries to the skin.<br />

In its ruling, the Self-Regulation Jury considers that we have a case <strong>of</strong><br />

advertising that is slanderous to razors. In its opinion, the advert images do<br />

not correctly transmit the idea <strong>of</strong> the true effects that depilation has on the<br />

skin. It goes far beyond this, exaggerating its effects and aggressively<br />

representing effects that could be considered devastating for people’s skin.<br />

This idea is reinforced by the declaration that accompanies the images, where<br />

it indicates that depilation can damage the skin.<br />

Nevertheless, the Jury does not consider that the advert infringes Rule 5 <strong>of</strong><br />

the Self-Regulation Code <strong>of</strong> Conduct as it is improbable that the advert<br />

objected to can generate fear or instill consternation among the consumers.<br />

In consequence, the Jury allowed the complaint by Gillette España, S.L. and<br />

declares that the advert infringes the principle <strong>of</strong> non-defamation <strong>of</strong> the Self-<br />

Regulation Code <strong>of</strong> Conduct.<br />

Comments: Although it is illicit to use a certain degree <strong>of</strong> “advertising exaggeration”, it<br />

should not be capable <strong>of</strong> slighting other products or services.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!