list of contributors - GALA
list of contributors - GALA
list of contributors - GALA
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
4. Case Report<br />
Topic: Fair Competition restrictive practices. Resolution Nº SPPLC/ 0007/2005<br />
Case: Televen vs. Venevision and Radio Caracas Television<br />
Who: Ministry <strong>of</strong> Production and Commerce – Superintendence for the Promotion<br />
and Protection <strong>of</strong> Fair Competition (PROCOMPETENCIA)<br />
When: February 24 th , 2005<br />
Where: Caracas – Venezuela.<br />
What Happened: Televen made a formal complaint against Venevision and Radio Caracas<br />
Television for the presumable commission <strong>of</strong> exclusionary practices, boycott<br />
and agreements for fixing fees and commercialization conditions in the<br />
advertising market.<br />
The plaintiff, which is a relatively small TV channel, alleged that Venevision<br />
and Radio Caracas Television, which are the biggest and older TV channels<br />
in Venezuela, were making practices to exclude Televen from the advertising<br />
and national TV investment market, by planning the programming and<br />
sharing the market thru fees and prices agreements and commercialization<br />
conditions for the advertisers, like making contracts which limited the<br />
possibility <strong>of</strong> contracting with Televen, in the pre-sale seasons.<br />
Televen also alleged that both channels were associated with a company<br />
named Sercotel, which collected the payments that the advertisers were<br />
making for the advertising spaces, and then shared it between the two<br />
channels.<br />
Both channels alleged, among other things, that they did not make<br />
agreements for sharing the market, and that their activities were common<br />
practices in the sector.<br />
Procompetencia decided that indeed there were arranged and exclusionary<br />
practices, since from the evidence was demonstrate the sharing <strong>of</strong> the<br />
investment <strong>of</strong> the advertisers and the existence from RCTV and Venevisión<br />
<strong>of</strong> an agreement <strong>of</strong> wills to distribute the market <strong>of</strong> advertising spaces. Also,<br />
that the preferential benefits that RCTV and Venevision had <strong>of</strong>fered to the<br />
advertisers in the pre-sale seasons, conditioning them to exclusivity,<br />
constituted an exclusionary practice.<br />
5. Case Report<br />
Topic: Coming into force <strong>of</strong> some dispositions <strong>of</strong> the Radio and TV Social Liability<br />
Act.<br />
When: March 8 th , 2005<br />
Where: Caracas, Venezuela<br />
What Happened: The Radio and TV Social Liability Act, which came into force last December<br />
8 th , 2004, postponed the validity <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> its disposition to lapses <strong>of</strong> three,<br />
six, nine, twelve, eighteen, twenty four and thirty six months. In this sense,<br />
last March 8 th came into force the following dispositions:<br />
• Adaptation <strong>of</strong> the TV and radio programs to each programming<br />
hours;<br />
• Broadcasting <strong>of</strong> one hundred percent (100%) <strong>of</strong> national<br />
production Propaganda;<br />
• Obligation <strong>of</strong> the TV channels to publish the programming<br />
guides. Also, before each program the station must announce the kind <strong>of</strong><br />
program and the classified elements that it contents; and to broadcast the<br />
programming according to the guides;