- Page 4 and 5: United States Page 130 Uruguay 133
- Page 6 and 7: marketing campaigns. The Code provi
- Page 8 and 9: AUSTRALIA Peter Le Guay Cowley Hear
- Page 10 and 11: The regulations are designed to inf
- Page 12 and 13: Flight Centre's airfares were guara
- Page 14 and 15: AUSTRIA Stefan Kofler Greiter Pegge
- Page 16 and 17: BOLIVIA Alexandra Blanco Guevara &
- Page 18 and 19: BRAZIL Valdir Rocha Veirano Advogad
- Page 20 and 21: 5. Title “Faculdades Hélio Rocha
- Page 22 and 23: CANADA Wendy Reed Geneviève Marcot
- Page 24 and 25: Second, the finding makes clear tha
- Page 26 and 27: CHILE Rodrigo Albagli Guillermo Riv
- Page 28 and 29: The Council let the claimant know a
- Page 30 and 31: COLOMBIA Ricardo Duarte Duarte Duar
- Page 32 and 33: 3. Legislation Decision or sentence
- Page 34 and 35: advertising and information. Nevert
- Page 36 and 37: ody parts. Even if all intimate par
- Page 38 and 39: CROATIA Mladen Vukmir Vukmir & Asso
- Page 40 and 41: the sentences used in the campaign
- Page 42 and 43: DENMARK Johan Løje Hans Flensted -
- Page 44 and 45: unsolicited electronic mail in the
- Page 46 and 47: FINLAND Bernt Juthström, Mikael Se
- Page 48 and 49: on information to be given in respe
- Page 50 and 51: practices by marketing COKO buildin
- Page 52 and 53:
2. Case Report Topic: The represent
- Page 54 and 55:
4. Self-regulation Topic: Can cigar
- Page 56 and 57:
HUNGARY Matias Vallejos Meana Sall
- Page 58 and 59:
4. Title Easyjet Topic: Comparative
- Page 60 and 61:
A complaint was also received by th
- Page 62 and 63:
Regulator (ComReg). Under the regul
- Page 64 and 65:
3. Legislation Topic: Consumer Prot
- Page 66 and 67:
Quite clearly the models are posing
- Page 68 and 69:
In this context measures taken to p
- Page 70 and 71:
models through a clear and illicit
- Page 72 and 73:
The Jury found that: - company B’
- Page 74 and 75:
Considering that the fidelity card
- Page 76 and 77:
JAPAN Wilfred Wakely Aiba & Partner
- Page 78 and 79:
cease and desist orders, administra
- Page 80 and 81:
The Court held the trademark was us
- Page 82 and 83:
2. Title TELEVISION ADVERTISING LES
- Page 84 and 85:
NEW ZEALAND Monica Choy Hesketh Hen
- Page 86 and 87:
3. Title Credit Card Companies Pros
- Page 88 and 89:
6. Title Therapeutic Services Adver
- Page 90 and 91:
PERU José Barreda Barreda Moller m
- Page 92 and 93:
- When it contains a false name or
- Page 94 and 95:
POLAND Ewa Skrzydło-Tefelska SKS L
- Page 96 and 97:
3. Issue: Advertising of medicines
- Page 98 and 99:
Comments: This decision shows that
- Page 100 and 101:
ROMANIA Florentina Dumitrescu Wood
- Page 102 and 103:
or services offered by it. Accordin
- Page 104 and 105:
following the legislative initiativ
- Page 106 and 107:
SOUTH AFRICA Chris Job & Lindsey Ki
- Page 108 and 109:
3. Misleading Advertising Topic: Ad
- Page 110 and 111:
In the amended advertisement the ph
- Page 112 and 113:
8. Offensive Advertising Topic: Sec
- Page 114 and 115:
SPAIN Gerhard W. Volz Schiller Abog
- Page 116 and 117:
The criticisms made against the Dra
- Page 118 and 119:
SWEDEN Michael Plogell Wistrand Adv
- Page 120 and 121:
fulfill the requirements of the MPA
- Page 122 and 123:
published advertisements aren’t p
- Page 124 and 125:
single bill, customer portal, 24-7
- Page 126 and 127:
Polo says it all - small but tough.
- Page 128 and 129:
6. Case Report Topic: Licensing Int
- Page 130 and 131:
UNITED STATES Douglas J. Wood Jenni
- Page 132 and 133:
5. Topic: Degrees of Deception: Int
- Page 134 and 135:
The court held that the image right
- Page 136 and 137:
penalties stipulated in the law. Th
- Page 138 and 139:
2. Case Report Topic: Incorporation
- Page 140 and 141:
4. Case Report Topic: Fair Competit
- Page 142 and 143:
transmission of institutional messa
- Page 144 and 145:
make its own determinations, and in
- Page 146 and 147:
CHILE Rodrigo Albagli & Guillermo R
- Page 148 and 149:
JAPAN Wilf Wakely Aiba & Partners 4
- Page 150:
SWITZERLAND Peter Hofer Frick, Hofe