26.10.2013 Views

list of contributors - GALA

list of contributors - GALA

list of contributors - GALA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

transmission <strong>of</strong> institutional messages neither will be taken in account.<br />

Inserted promotions should not disturb the vision <strong>of</strong> the programs, or<br />

occupy more than a sixth <strong>of</strong> the TV screen; and when a sport program or<br />

show is repeated, will be able to maintain the advertising inserts included in<br />

the original transmission.<br />

Additionally two more Providences were enacted. One regarding the<br />

broadcasting <strong>of</strong> musical works, which develops the dispositions regarding<br />

the broadcasting <strong>of</strong> Venezuelan, Venezuelan tradition, Latin American and<br />

Caribbean works. It defines each one <strong>of</strong> these works and the percentages <strong>of</strong><br />

diffusion <strong>of</strong> each one <strong>of</strong> them.<br />

The second one, about the conditions for the Radio and TV service provision,<br />

develops the dispositions about the audio intensity, transmission <strong>of</strong> the<br />

National Anthem, programming hours and the warranty for a responsible<br />

selection <strong>of</strong> programming.<br />

7. Case Report<br />

Topic: Decision N° 608 <strong>of</strong> the Andean Community “Regulation for the Protection<br />

and Promotion <strong>of</strong> Free Competition in the Andean Community”<br />

Who: Andean Community<br />

When: March 29 th , 2005<br />

Where: Lima – Perú.<br />

What Happened: The Commission <strong>of</strong> the Andean Community (members countries are<br />

Venezuela, Colombia, Perú, Bolivia and Ecuador) in order to watch for the<br />

integrity <strong>of</strong> the benefits achieved in the Andean Integration Process, decided<br />

to substitute the Decision N° 285 <strong>of</strong> the Commission <strong>of</strong> the Cartagena<br />

Agreement “Regulation to Prevent or Correct Distortions in Competition,<br />

Generated by the Restrictive Practices against Free Competition” from 1991,<br />

for the Decision N° 608 <strong>of</strong> the Andean Community “Regulation for the<br />

Protection and Promotion <strong>of</strong> Free Competition”.<br />

It is important to emphasize that the said Andean Normative applies only to<br />

the conducts that take place in one or more Member Countries and whose<br />

effects are produced in one or more Member Countries; or in the territory <strong>of</strong><br />

a Non Member Country and which real effects are produced in one or more<br />

Member Countries<br />

In consequence, when the origin and effect <strong>of</strong> the conducts are produced<br />

only in the territory <strong>of</strong> a country, as well as in those cases not included in the<br />

Decision, the national legislation will apply.<br />

In the specific case <strong>of</strong> Venezuela, the applicable national regulation is the<br />

“Promotion and Protection <strong>of</strong> Free Competition Act” (PROCOMPETENCIA<br />

Act) <strong>of</strong> 1992; the Commercial Code <strong>of</strong> 1919; the Paris Convention and the<br />

Decision N° 486 <strong>of</strong> the Common Regime about Industrial Property in the<br />

Andean Community, in the matters <strong>of</strong> unfair competition related to<br />

Industrial Property.<br />

The Decision N° 608 is a more complete and more elaborated legal text than<br />

the former Decision N° 285, even though it only refers to restrictive practices<br />

to the free competition, and nothing about unfair competition.<br />

For example, when it defines the concepts <strong>of</strong> “conduct”, “act”, “agreement”,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!