26.10.2013 Views

list of contributors - GALA

list of contributors - GALA

list of contributors - GALA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4. Self-regulation<br />

Topic: Can cigarettes be a part <strong>of</strong> history or does their image always constitute<br />

prohibited indirect advertising?<br />

Who: Bibliothèque Nationale de France<br />

When: April 2005<br />

Where: France<br />

What Happened: A poster was created to promote an exhibition at the Bibliothèque Nationale de<br />

France, relating to the French early 20 th century philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre.<br />

The poster uses a famous picture <strong>of</strong> the philosopher, where the cigarette he<br />

held between his fingers has been erased in order to avoid breaching the<br />

provisions <strong>of</strong> the Loi Evin (see ad below).<br />

It has been considered that this poster disguises the historical truth.<br />

The BVP took this opportunity to remind the parties <strong>of</strong> the applicable<br />

principles :<br />

- the status <strong>of</strong> a picture, even though it is historical or artistic, changes as<br />

soon as it is used for advertising purposes : it becomes advertising material ;<br />

- the application <strong>of</strong> the Loi Evin is very strict and indirect advertising occurs<br />

very easily ;<br />

- for purposes <strong>of</strong> legal security, the BVP <strong>of</strong>ten advises that images showing<br />

famous people be modified in order not to show their cigarette, cigar or pipe.<br />

Comments: Advertisers seek above all to avoid problems and therefore take all necessary<br />

steps to this purpose. However, one could wonder if such practices are not<br />

excessive or absurd and if the spirit <strong>of</strong> the law requires such drastic<br />

measures.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!