list of contributors - GALA
list of contributors - GALA
list of contributors - GALA
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
COSTA RICA<br />
Uri Weinstok M.<br />
Niehaus & Weinstok<br />
uweinstok@niehauslaw.com<br />
www.niehauslaw.com<br />
1. Proposed<br />
Regulation:<br />
Proposed reform to the General Health Law<br />
Topic: Health related messages<br />
Who: Asamblea Legislativa<br />
When: March 2005<br />
What Happened: The Ministry <strong>of</strong> Health sent an initiative to the Congress (Asamblea<br />
Legislativa), promoting a reform <strong>of</strong> the country’s General Health Law (Ley<br />
General de Salud).<br />
If this reform is approved, all messages that related to public health, or that<br />
in the opinion <strong>of</strong> the authorities may affect public health (including news,<br />
reports, and advertising) will have to be previously cleared for publication<br />
by the Ministry.<br />
Comments: It is very unlikely that an initiative <strong>of</strong> this kind will be approved. However,<br />
the sole fact that it has been sent to Congress tells a lot about the negative<br />
attitude <strong>of</strong> certain authorities towards free speech.<br />
2. Case Report: SMIRNOFF VODKA – “Drink responsibly”<br />
Topic: Alcoholic Beverages<br />
Where: Instituto sobre Alcoholismo y Farmacodependencia (IAFA)<br />
When: December 2004<br />
What Happened: IAFA, the governmental <strong>of</strong>fice in charge <strong>of</strong> reviewing and clearing<br />
advertisements <strong>of</strong> alcoholic beverages rejected an ad for SMIRNOFF<br />
VODKA, because it contained the phrase “Drink responsibly”.<br />
According to IAFA, this phrase is an explicit invitation to drink, disguised as<br />
a warning. The decision stated that only governmental approved warnings<br />
may be included, even if the requested phrase was written in addition to<br />
such warning.<br />
Comments: This case is a good example on how an overzealous regulator may actually<br />
loose the point <strong>of</strong> the real purposes <strong>of</strong> the regulation. These types <strong>of</strong><br />
decisions, which reflect a clear distrust in the industry, are actually impeding<br />
the advertiser from making more responsible marketing.<br />
3. Case Report: Rexona Fresh Intense<br />
Topic: Decency in advertising<br />
Where: Oficina Nacional de Control de Propaganda (ONCP)<br />
When: January 2005<br />
What Happened: This ad <strong>of</strong> a deodorant used different persons in daily activities using body<br />
paint. The paint was very similar to their normal clothes, and was used to<br />
give the impression <strong>of</strong> persons with his/her clothes stuck to their bodies due<br />
to excessive heat, as opposed to the fresh feeling <strong>of</strong> using the said deodorant.<br />
ONCP suspended a TV commercial on the basis that it improperly exposed