list of contributors - GALA
list of contributors - GALA
list of contributors - GALA
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Comments: Although this is good news for advertisers, we should add one word<br />
<strong>of</strong> caution. Don’t expect the UK trade marks registry to suddenly go<br />
s<strong>of</strong>t on slogans that are not a ‘badge <strong>of</strong> origin’. Or to put it another<br />
way: “If you want a trade mark registration for your slogan? Come<br />
to sunny Alicante!”<br />
8. Self-Regulation<br />
Topic: Misleading Advertising<br />
Who: Office <strong>of</strong> Fair Trading<br />
When: Winter 2004<br />
What Happened: A twenty first century British Expeditionary Force has once again ventured<br />
into plucky little Belgium to keep dear old Blighty safe from Johnny<br />
Foreigner. And this time, it really was all over by Christmas.<br />
In December, the Office <strong>of</strong> Fair Trading obtained an injunction in Brussels<br />
against a Belgian company that had been sending about one million mailings<br />
every month into the UK, purporting to be notifications <strong>of</strong> large prize wins -<br />
typically £10,000 - which would be paid out when the recipient placed an<br />
order from the accompanying catalogue. In reality, the punters were placed<br />
into a prize draw whose winners had been pre-selected, and most <strong>of</strong> them<br />
ended up with nothing. The fact that the company received 4,000 orders<br />
every day suggests that the old adage about there being one born every<br />
minute was probably an under-estimate.<br />
The sting in the tail for the company concerned, D. Duchesne, who trade in<br />
the UK as TV Direct and Just 4 You, is that they will be fined 25,000 Euros<br />
(about £17,250) every time they breach the injunction.<br />
Comments: This is the first time that cross border court action has been taken in Europe<br />
by the regulators using their powers under the Injunctions Directive. When<br />
the OFT’s request for an undertaking to comply with the Misleading<br />
Advertising Directive was refused, an injunction application was its only<br />
alternative.