manual for social impact assessment of land-based ... - Forest Trends

More documents

Recommendations

Info

10.4 Social Performance Indicators from the Microfinance Sector The ‘Social Performance Working Group’ has developed a core or common set of ‘social performance indicators’ for evaluating microfinance institutions (MFIs). A related initiative is the Social Impact Measurement (SIM) Tool developed by the International Network of Alternative Financial Institutions (INAFI), composed of Oxfam, Novib and Ordina, as a cost-effective approach to evaluation. The focus is on easy to measure indicators of performance, including beneficiary perceptions of change. Commonly used indicators by the micro-finance sector are: Indicators of changes in assets: • value of equipment/building for non-farm enterprises • animal ownership; • land ownership; • ownership of transport assets • ownership of consumer appliances Indicators of changes in living conditions and reduced vulnerability: • housing conditions • type and level of cooking fuel • access to drinking water • regularity or frequency of meals • quality of food • an expenditure based index showing whether people have reduced or increased their expenditure on livestock, production materials, housing, and other assets • savings (increase or decrease) Schooling indicators: • % of children reaching 5 th grade 23 or finishing primary school • % of primary school aged daughters/sons attending school • % of secondary school aged daughters/sons attending school Health indicators: • Number of meals per day (strong correlation between nutrition and health) • Number of days sick during a given period • % of births attended by skilled personnel • Under 5 mortality rate 23 This is the preferred indicator of the multiple donor Education For All (EFA) program since grade 5 of primary school has been identified as the ‘threshold for sustainable literacy’. Social Impact Assessment of Land-Based Carbon Projects (1.0) – Part II | 123
Empowerment of women indicators: • economic, social and political indicators are under development by INAFI Social capital indicators: • degree of social organization - average number of community organizations participated in by beneficiaries • social and political empowerment - perceived freedom to actively participate in meetings or collective social actions • decision-making power - perceived degree of power to take decisions; number of beneficiaries holding a leadership position Sources: SEEP Network. 2006. Social Performance Map. The SEEP Network Social Performance Working Group. Washington, DC. www.seepnetwork.org; INAFI. 2006. Social Impact Assessment. Theoretical background paper for SIM tool INFAFI. www.inafiinternational.org Social Impact Assessment of Land-Based Carbon Projects (1.0) – Part II | 124
Page 1 and 2:
MANUAL FOR SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Page 3 and 4:
Table of Contents T1 Introduction t
Page 5 and 6:
List of Boxes Box T1. General Data
Page 7 and 8:
Forest Trends’ mission is to main
Page 9 and 10:
List of Acronyms (Core Guidance and
Page 11 and 12:
Sections T5 and T6 present a range
Page 13 and 14:
Figure T1: The Main Stages and Step
Page 15 and 16:
Figure T2: Example of a Conceptual
Page 17 and 18:
Figure T4: Generic Conceptual Model
Page 19 and 20:
Stages 3-5 of Open Standards The re
Page 21 and 22:
Figure T7: Diagram of the ROtI Anal
Page 23 and 24:
table so they can be read, discusse
Page 25 and 26:
Table T1: Theory of Change for Seyc
Page 27 and 28:
T2.4 Participatory Impact Pathways
Page 29 and 30:
Table T4: The PIPA Outcomes Logic M
Page 31 and 32:
Main Sources and Further Guidance h
Page 33 and 34:
T3 Sustainability Framework Approac
Page 35 and 36:
Figure T12: SAPA Initiative Modifie
Page 37 and 38:
1. Identify a small group of key in
Page 39 and 40:
Table T6: Example of LOAM Livelihoo
Page 41 and 42:
T4 Matching Methods T4.1 Introducti
Page 43 and 44:
Advantages and Disadvantages of ‘
Page 45 and 46:
Box T1. General Data Collection and
Page 47 and 48:
Box T3. Data Collection Methods Pro
Page 49 and 50:
T6 Specific Data Collection Methods
Page 51 and 52:
Table T8: Example of a Household BN
Page 53 and 54:
The poverty index can range from 0%
Page 55 and 56:
The PIA guide proposes the followin
Page 57 and 58:
day. The ‘before project’ score
Page 59 and 60:
Figure T15: “Before and After”
Page 61 and 62:
Table T10: Pair-Wise Ranking Showin
Page 63 and 64:
Impact calendars Impact calendars c
Page 65 and 66:
A large sample is needed to be conf
Page 67 and 68:
Table T15: Scoring of Changes in Ag
Page 69 and 70:
Table T17: QPA Scoring of Social Eq
Page 71 and 72:
T6.4 Participatory Economic Valuati
Page 73 and 74:
Advantages and Disadvantages of Par
Page 75 and 76:
The stories are collected from thos
Page 77 and 78:
Main Sources and Further Guidance D
Page 79 and 80:
Table T19: Stakeholder Analysis Pro
Page 81 and 82: Figure T18. Venn Diagram with Stake
Page 83 and 84: T7.2 Problem Trees Assuming it is p
Page 85 and 86: T7.3 Scenario Analysis Scenarios ar
Page 87 and 88: Box T7. Driving Forces in a Communi
Page 89 and 90: Maack, J.N. 2001. Scenario analysis
Page 91 and 92: In terms of non-monetary benefits,
Page 93 and 94: and duration of employment, the sta
Page 95 and 96: Physical Capital Positive changes i
Page 97 and 98: these strategic resource off-limits
Page 99 and 100: einforce existing institutions or n
Page 101 and 102: PROJECT: PROFAFOR TYPE: Plantations
Page 103 and 104: their occurrence will depend in lar
Page 105 and 106: HUMAN CAPITAL Increase in perceptio
Page 107 and 108: Table T26: Potential Mid- to Long-T
Page 109 and 110: Figure T20: Example of Relationship
Page 111 and 112: Figure T22: Additional Potential So
Page 113 and 114: T9 Further Guidance on Indicator Se
Page 115 and 116: Box T9. Goals and Indicators Defini
Page 117 and 118: When selecting indicators, it is be
Page 119 and 120: Table T27: Indicator Quality Assess
Page 121 and 122: Box T10. Indicators Derived from th
Page 123 and 124: T9.5 Disaggregating Indicators Mult
Page 125 and 126: Mayoux, L. 2001. What Do We Want to
Page 127 and 128: Landscape Outcomes Assessment Metho
Page 129 and 130: • Access to essential services (w
Page 131: T10.3 Social Indicators Derived fro
Page 135 and 136: CCBA, 2008. Climate, Community & Bi
Page 137 and 138: James A., Pangtey V., Singh P. & Vi
Page 139: SEEP Network. 2006. Social Performa
show all

manual for social impact assessment of land-based ... - Forest Trends

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?