manual for social impact assessment of land-based ... - Forest Trends
manual for social impact assessment of land-based ... - Forest Trends
manual for social impact assessment of land-based ... - Forest Trends
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Figure T7: Diagram <strong>of</strong> the ROtI Analytical Framework<br />
Strategy<br />
Source: Reproduced with permission from GEF Evaluation Office & Conservation Development Centre. 2009. The ROtI<br />
Handbook: Towards Enhancing the Impacts <strong>of</strong> Environmental Projects. Methodological Paper #2. Global Environment<br />
Facility: Washington DC. http://www.thegef.org/gef/node/2096<br />
Intermediate States<br />
Project Log-frame Review Outcomes-Impacts Analysis Impacts Identification<br />
OUTPUTS<br />
OUTCOMES<br />
ASSUMPTIONS<br />
IMPACT DRIVERS<br />
INTERMEDIATE<br />
STATES<br />
IMPACTS<br />
Intermediate states can be thought <strong>of</strong> achievements that increase the likelihood <strong>of</strong> sustainable<br />
project <strong>impact</strong>s. They provide the missing middle <strong>of</strong> the “if-then” statements between outcomes and<br />
<strong>impact</strong>s. They are transitional conditions between outcomes and <strong>impact</strong>s, and must be achieved in<br />
order <strong>for</strong> the project <strong>impact</strong>s to be achieved. For example, an intermediate state was identified <strong>for</strong><br />
improving the management capacity <strong>of</strong> a protected area in Uganda following identification <strong>of</strong> the<br />
desired outcome and <strong>impact</strong>:<br />
• Outcome: Management capacity <strong>of</strong> Bwindi and Mgahinga National Parks improved<br />
• Impact: Enhanced conservation status <strong>of</strong> ecosystem conservation targets<br />
• Intermediate state: Uganda Wildlife Authority implements policies sufficient to address<br />
priority threats to conservation targets<br />
In other words achievement <strong>of</strong> this intermediate state would ensure that the park authorities have<br />
enough resources, and receive the necessary policy support <strong>for</strong> achieving the desired <strong>impact</strong>. The<br />
key question <strong>for</strong> identifying an intermediate state is whether there is a missing gap between the<br />
project outcomes and expected <strong>impact</strong>s. In some projects, achievement <strong>of</strong> an outcome may be<br />
sufficient <strong>for</strong> the <strong>impact</strong>s to be realized, but if the outcomes have been correctly stated as short to<br />
Social Impact Assessment <strong>of</strong> Land-Based Carbon Projects (1.0) – Part II | 12