26.10.2013 Views

manual for social impact assessment of land-based ... - Forest Trends

manual for social impact assessment of land-based ... - Forest Trends

manual for social impact assessment of land-based ... - Forest Trends

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Impact calendars<br />

Impact calendars can be useful <strong>for</strong> measuring <strong>impact</strong>s against ‘dimensional’ indicators such as time<br />

and distance. Catley et al (2008) describe how an <strong>impact</strong> calendar was used to analyze the number<br />

<strong>of</strong> months <strong>of</strong> household food security ‘be<strong>for</strong>e’ and ‘after’ a project. Project participants were given<br />

25 counters representing a household’s post-harvest food balance. Using 12 cards, one <strong>for</strong> each<br />

month <strong>of</strong> the year, participants were asked to distribute the counters along a 12 month calendar to<br />

show the monthly household utilization <strong>of</strong> the harvested maize, as shown in Table T12.<br />

Table T12: Food Security Impact Calendar Using 25 Counters<br />

April May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar<br />

2004-2005 •••••• ••••• •••• •• •<br />

•••••• •<br />

2006-2007 •••••• •••• •••• ••• ••• ••<br />

actual •••<br />

2006-2007 •••••• ••••• ••••<br />

(Control) ••••••<br />

••<br />

••<br />

Source: Reproduced with permission from Catley, A., Burns, J., Abebe, D. and Suji, O. (2008). Participatory<br />

Impact Assessment: A guide <strong>for</strong> practitioners. Feinstein International Center, Med<strong>for</strong>d<br />

This exercise was done three times: firstly with the project participants <strong>for</strong> the agricultural year<br />

be<strong>for</strong>e the project started; secondly with the same people <strong>for</strong> the agricultural year after the project<br />

had started; and thirdly with a control group - community members who had not participated in the<br />

project – <strong>for</strong> the year after the project started. The three sets <strong>of</strong> time series data were then graphed<br />

as shown in Figure T17.<br />

FigureT17: Changes in Number <strong>of</strong> Months <strong>of</strong> Food Security<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Duration <strong>of</strong> Household Food Security (n = 1)<br />

Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar<br />

2004-2005 2006/07 Project Participants 2006/07 Non-Participants<br />

Source: Reproduced with permission from Catley, A., Burns, J., Abebe, D. and Suji, O. (2008). Participatory<br />

Impact Assessment: A guide <strong>for</strong> practitioners. Feinstein International Center, Med<strong>for</strong>d.<br />

Social Impact Assessment <strong>of</strong> Land-Based Carbon Projects (1.0) – Part II | 54

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!