21.11.2013 Views

View PDF Version - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam

View PDF Version - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam

View PDF Version - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Discussion<br />

Characterization of the reciprocal t(4;22)(pI6;qll) in meningioma 32 has led to the<br />

identification of a new gene, consisting of at least two exons of about 4.7 kb (5' end) and<br />

2.8 kb (3' end). The entire 5' exon and genomic sequences upstream (results not shown) are<br />

extremely GC rich. This area apparently is a very large GC island. The translocation<br />

breakpoint is located in the 5' exon, which strongly suggests that the gene is directly<br />

involved in the tumorigenesis of meningioma 32. Therefore, we have called this gene MNl,<br />

for candidate meningioma gene I. Many reports describe the use of reciprocal translocations<br />

for the isolations of cancer genes. Specific chromosomal translocations are involved in the<br />

activation of proto-oncogenes as is the case in many leukemias (Solomon et aI., 1991). In<br />

addition, they can also inactivate a tumor suppressor gene. For instance, in neurofibromatosis<br />

type I (NFl) two reciprocal translocations involving band 17ql1.2 resulted in the successful<br />

isolation of the NFl tumor suppressor gene (Cawthon et aI., 1990; Viskochil et aI., 1990;<br />

Wallage et aI., 1990). In agreement with the observed loss of chromosome 22 in<br />

meningiomas this might suggest that the MNl gene is a tumor suppressor gene and that the<br />

translocation in meningioma 32 inactivates the gene. Northern blot analysis of meningioma<br />

32 RNA supports this. Southern blot analysis of71 meningiomas with probes from the MNI<br />

region revealed a point mutation and a 1.5 kb homozygous deletion in one tumor (55). This<br />

tumor was from a patient with multiple meningiomas. Further analysis showed that the<br />

alterations were found also in the gennline of this patient and were located about 10 kb<br />

downsteam of the MNl gene (I.ekanne Deprez et aI., 1994a). One might speculate that these<br />

alterations interfere with MNl gene function. However, this gene was highly expressed in<br />

meningioma 55. Northern analysis of the MNl gene in other meningiomas also showed high<br />

expression in some and low or no expression at all in others. This might indicate that the<br />

expression of the MNl gene is deregulated in meningiomas. Further study at the protein level<br />

is however needed to investigate this in more detail.<br />

Although the nucleotide sequence as we have obtained so far would suggest 2 possible<br />

ORFs, in vitro transcription/translation experiments suggest that only one large protein of<br />

approximately 3.8 kb is formed (Molyn et aI., personal communication). Therefore, we<br />

expect that both ORFs are part of this large protein and that some sequence artifacts are still<br />

present in the I kb that separate them. The scanning model for the initiation of translation<br />

136

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!