View PDF Version - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
View PDF Version - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
View PDF Version - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
with wild-type (wI) p53 proved the opposite. From these studies wt p53 was found to be<br />
involved in growth suppression and inhibition of transformation (Finlay et aI., 1989; Eliyahu<br />
et aI., 1989; Baker et aI., 1990). Therefore, the wt p53 gene has clear characteristics of a<br />
tumor suppressor gene.<br />
Different mechanisms have been found in human tumors that alter p53 and in turn<br />
inactivate wt p53 function. These alterations can occur at either the protein or DNA level.<br />
At the protein level, the wt p53 protein was found in a complex with various DNA tumor<br />
virus encoded oncoproteins (EIB, large T antigen and E6). In addition, p53 was found in a<br />
complex with MDM2, a cellular protein with transforming properties (Momand et aI., 1992).<br />
Furthermore, mutant p53 can bind with wt p53 (see below). The binding of these proteins<br />
most likely inactivates p53 and thereby contributes to oncogenesis. Alterations at the DNA<br />
level appear to be the most common mechanism. These alterations include the presence of<br />
a mutations in the p53 gene and loss of the chromosomal region that bears this gene. Most<br />
tumors show a mutation in one copy of the gene and loss of the second allele because the p53<br />
containing portion of chromosome 17p is lost. In these cases p53 follows a recessive<br />
mechanism of tumorigenesis. Mutation analyses of the p53 gene in human tumors revealed<br />
two remarkable findings. First, mutations in this gene were the most common genetic<br />
alteration yet identified in human cancer. These include cancers of the colon, lung,<br />
oesophagus, breast, liver, brain and hemopoietic tissues (Hollstein et aI., 1991; Levine et aI.,<br />
1991; Levine, 1992). Second, 80% of p53 mutations involve single base changes (missense<br />
mutations). Most mutations are clustered in the central, highly conserved regions of the gene.<br />
However, the types and sites of the mutations can vary amoung tumor types and probably<br />
reflect exposure to specific etiologic agents (Harris and Hollstein, 1993). Many of the p53<br />
missense mutations, which lead to an amino acid change and a full-length mutant protein,<br />
show similar detrimental effects on protein conformation (Gannon et aI., 1990) and function<br />
(Kern et aI., 1992; Vogelstein and Kinzler., 1992). On the protein level an increase in halflife<br />
from minutes to hours has been observed (Bartek et aI., 1991). Although most tumors<br />
show abnormalities of both alleles, some tumors show only one mutated copy. This indicates<br />
that in these cases p53 did not follow a recessive mechanism of tumor development. Instead<br />
a 'dominant negative' mechanism was proposed in which only one mutated copy of p53 is<br />
sufficient to contribute to tumor formation. One plausible explanation for this might be that<br />
the abundantly expressed mutated p53 protein competes with and blocks the activity of the<br />
20