RELATIONS OF DOMINANCE AND EQUALITY IN D. H. LAWRENCE

27
a position Lawrence could not defend "neither as thinker or as
artist" (p.256).
This is what made him return to the pacific
love between man and woman as represented by Lady Chatterley's
Lover, his final novel.
Within three years Lawrence's attitude
towards The Plumed Serpent was one of dislike because he could
not believe in the leader of men whom he now saw as "a back
number", as he told in a letter to Witter Bynner in March 1928.
Lawrence could not believe in a successful relationship between
the strong male and the submissive female.
Thus, Lady Chatterley
attempts to be (as Millet pointed out) Lawrence's 'peace with the
female'.
Conflict in Lawrence's novels, as Daleski sees it, can be
defined in terms of his duality, of the opposition of the female
and male principles.
This duality leads to a permanent struggle
for domination between the couples.
Pritchard's analysis of Lawrence does not differ in the
long run from Daleski's.
It would be merely repetitive to state
all his ideas here, since the main topics have already been
discussed.
Hence, I have chosen just a few passages in which
Pritchard's ideas do not match with those presented by other
critics, especially by Daleski.
The passages I have chosen
relate strictly to the sexual tones of Lawrence's main novels.
The critic sees Paul Morel's conflict in love in the light
of Freud's essay "The Most Prevalent Form of Degradation in
Erotic Life".
Pritchard says that in this essay
Freud discusses, what he terms 'psychical
impotence', the inability to achieve satisfaction
in normal heterosexual relations, which he claims
is caused by the son's early fixation of desire
on the mother (p.33).
Therefore, Paul's inability to love Miriam and Clara is due to