No. 5-99-0830 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ... - Appellate.net
No. 5-99-0830 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ... - Appellate.net
No. 5-99-0830 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ... - Appellate.net
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1. Plaintiffs’ Body Shop Witnesses Greatly Exceeded<br />
The Permissible Scope Of Lay Opinion Testimony ..............86<br />
Baltus v. Weaver Div. of Kidde & Co., 1<strong>99</strong> Ill.App.3d 821<br />
(1st Dist. 1<strong>99</strong>0) ...................................................87<br />
Bogosian v. Mercedes Benz of N. Am., 104 F.3d 472<br />
(1st Cir. 1<strong>99</strong>7) ...................................................87<br />
Davis v. International Harvester Co., 167 Ill.App.3d 814<br />
(2d Dist. 1988) ...................................................87<br />
Freeding-Skokie Roll-Off Serv., Inc. v. Hamilton,<br />
108 Ill.2d 217 (1985) ..............................................87<br />
People v. <strong>No</strong>vak, 163 Ill.2d 93 (1<strong>99</strong>4) .................................88<br />
2. The Opinions Of Plaintiffs’ Expert Witnesses Were<br />
Inherently Unreliable And Should <strong>No</strong>t Have Been<br />
Admitted .................................................89<br />
People v. <strong>No</strong>vak, 163 Ill.2d 93 (1<strong>99</strong>4) .................................90<br />
MICHAEL H. GRAHAM, CLEARY & GRAHAM’S HANDBOOK <strong>OF</strong><br />
ILL<strong>IN</strong>OIS EVIDENCE (7th ed. 1<strong>99</strong>9) ....................................90<br />
Donaldson v. Central Illinois Public Service Co.,<br />
2000 WL 268307 (5th Dist. 2000) ....................................90<br />
Harris v. Cropmate Co., 302 Ill. App. 3d 364 (1<strong>99</strong>9) .....................90<br />
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579<br />
(1<strong>99</strong>3) ..........................................................90<br />
Protestant Mem. Med. Ctr., Inc. v. Department of Pub. Aid,<br />
295 Ill.App.3d 249 (5th Dist. 1<strong>99</strong>8) ...................................90<br />
O’Conner v. Commonwealth Edison Co., 807 F. Supp. 1376<br />
(C.D. Ill. 1<strong>99</strong>2), aff’d, 13 F.3d 1090 (7th Cir. 1<strong>99</strong>4) ......................90<br />
Comer v. American Elec. Power, 63 F. Supp.2d 927<br />
(N.D. Ind. 1<strong>99</strong>9) ..................................................90<br />
-x-