No. 5-99-0830 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ... - Appellate.net
No. 5-99-0830 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ... - Appellate.net
No. 5-99-0830 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ... - Appellate.net
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
A. It Is Unconstitutional To Punish State Farm Under Illinois Law For<br />
Transactions That Occurred Entirely Outside Of Illinois.<br />
The Supreme Court has held in no uncertain terms that the Constitution prohibits one<br />
state from attempting to punish under its own law transactions that occurred entirely in other<br />
states. BMW, 517 U.S. at 571-73. The Court explained that principles of state sovereignty<br />
and comity embodied in the Constitution establish that “no single State [may] impose its<br />
own policy choice on neighboring States” and that “one State’s power to impose burdens on<br />
the interstate market . . . is not only subordinate to the federal power over interstate<br />
commerce, but is also constrained by the need to respect the interests of the other States.”<br />
Id. at 571. The Court concluded:<br />
We think it follows from these principles of state sovereignty and comity that a State<br />
may not impose economic sanctions on violators of its laws with the intent of<br />
changing the tortfeasors’ lawful conduct in other States. . . . [T]he economic<br />
penalties that a State such as Alabama inflicts on those who transgress its laws . . .<br />
must be supported by the State’s interest in protecting its own consumers and its own<br />
economy. . . . Alabama does not have the power . . . to punish BMW for conduct that<br />
was lawful where it occurred and that had no impact on Alabama or its residents.<br />
Id. at 572-73 (emphasis added).<br />
The present case is a carbon copy of BMW. In BMW, the evidence was that the<br />
defendant’s nationwide policy comported with the laws of every state that had legislated on<br />
the subject. So too here: no state prohibits specification of non-OEM parts, and well over<br />
half the states either authorize or affirmatively encourage the practice. 63/<br />
Combustion Eng’g, Inc., 170 F.3d 1320, 1334 (11th Cir. 1<strong>99</strong>9). The question whether the<br />
punitive damages are excessive under state law is subject to review for abuse of discretion.<br />
Hough v. Mooningham, 139 Ill.App.3d 1018, 1024 (5th Dist. 1986).<br />
63/<br />
Even assuming that State Farm’s specification of non-OEM parts were wrongful in<br />
every state in the country (which it was not), that still would not justify allowing an Illinois<br />
-137-