No. 5-99-0830 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ... - Appellate.net
No. 5-99-0830 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ... - Appellate.net
No. 5-99-0830 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ... - Appellate.net
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
specify non-OEM parts, see DX 1244 at 16; the estimate indicated that State Farm had done<br />
so; and the Guarantee provided a remedy for people who were dissatisfied with the non-<br />
OEM parts they received. Although some policyholders expressed skepticism before non-<br />
OEM parts were put on their cars, virtually none complained afterward to State Farm, to<br />
insurance regulators, or to consumer advocates. R. 8339, 9442-63. If all non-OEM parts<br />
were “inferior,” and if using them was outrageous and evil, more consumers undoubtedly<br />
would have complained. State Farm acted reasonably when it interpreted the lack of<br />
complaints as confirmation that its policy of saving money for policyholders by specifying<br />
non-OEM parts was satisfying consumers. R. 10158-59 (specifying non-OEM parts did not<br />
lower renewal rates). Under no stretch of the imagination did it act with “evil motive.”<br />
D. The Punitive Award Is Grossly Excessive And Must Be Vacated Entirely<br />
Or Drastically Reduced.<br />
The circuit court’s entire explanation for its decision to impose a $600 million<br />
punitive damages award on State Farm is as follows:<br />
A court, in determining the amount of a punitive damage award, should consider the<br />
nature and enormity of the wrong, the defendant’s financial status and the<br />
defendant’s potential liability in other cases. The court has considered these factors<br />
and determines that $600,000,000.00 in punitive damages is appropriate.<br />
A. 13 (citation omitted). The court went on to mention that State Farm could afford to pay<br />
the award, id., but did not explain why a lesser award would have been too low. Thus, a<br />
single sentence was all the court deemed necessary to justify the largest punitive damages<br />
award (by several orders of magnitude) ever levied in Illinois. Even if this Court were to<br />
conclude that punitive damages may lawfully be imposed in this case, the unprecedented<br />
$600 million award is grossly excessive in relation to Illinois’ interests in retribution and<br />
-142-