volume 1 - Halifax Regional Municipality
volume 1 - Halifax Regional Municipality
volume 1 - Halifax Regional Municipality
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Halifax</strong> Water Integrated Resource Plan<br />
Integrated Resource Plan Development and Evaluation<br />
the current overflow control program at the B Level corresponding to 10 years was<br />
felt to be reasonable.<br />
• The difference in 30-year NPV based on the Baseline and Enhanced Overflow<br />
Control Programs (e.g. Plan 15-3 versus Plan 22-3) was $71 million. The Enhanced<br />
Overflow Control Program does further reduce environmental impacts for the<br />
additional cost.<br />
At this stage in the alternative resource plan development and analysis, the 30-year NPV<br />
is similar for all plans. The differences largely lie in the level of environmental and public<br />
health impact.<br />
Based on the analysis presented above, it was decided to short-list four of the refined<br />
plans. The analysis of the refined plans is discussed in the next section.<br />
5.11 SHORT-LIST PLAN ANALYSIS<br />
The four short-listed alternative resource plans are presented in Table 5.11. The NPV of<br />
cost difference between the most and least is $121 million over the 30-year period. This<br />
difference is comprised of approximately $71 million difference due to the Enhanced<br />
Overflow Control Program and a $50 million difference due to the compliance timing for<br />
the Enhanced Nutrient Removal Program.<br />
Table 5.11<br />
Short-Listed Alternative Resource Plans<br />
Plan No.<br />
30 Yr. NPV<br />
$million<br />
Current WWTF<br />
Current<br />
Overflow<br />
Future WWTF<br />
Nutrient<br />
Future Overflow<br />
21-4 $2,458 B B B<br />
38-4 $2,507 B B A<br />
28-4 $2,529 B B B<br />
40-4 $2,579 B B A<br />
Baseline<br />
Enhanced<br />
The timing of the current WWTF compliance program and the current overflow control<br />
program has already been discussed under the refined plan analysis. The remaining<br />
decisions in connection with the short-listed plans are associated with the timing of<br />
nutrient control implementation and the level of future overflow control.<br />
As far as nutrient control timing is concerned, there is a $50 million cost increase for a<br />
program with a 10-year timetable compared to a program with a 20-year timetable.<br />
The expected benefits of the Enhanced Nutrient Removal Program by way of reductions<br />
in N and P loadings are shown in Figures 5.7 and 5.8. For illustrative purposes, the BLT<br />
and Mill Cove plants were not included in this analysis but would also have substantially<br />
reduced loadings with the Enhanced Nutrient Control Program. It should also be noted<br />
that operating permits for the WWTFs currently do not have total N limits.<br />
Revision: 2012-10-29 Integrated Resource Plan 73<br />
October 31 2012 Page 106 of 272