05.01.2014 Views

volume 1 - Halifax Regional Municipality

volume 1 - Halifax Regional Municipality

volume 1 - Halifax Regional Municipality

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Halifax</strong> Water Integrated Resource Plan<br />

Integrated Resource Plan Development and Evaluation<br />

the current overflow control program at the B Level corresponding to 10 years was<br />

felt to be reasonable.<br />

• The difference in 30-year NPV based on the Baseline and Enhanced Overflow<br />

Control Programs (e.g. Plan 15-3 versus Plan 22-3) was $71 million. The Enhanced<br />

Overflow Control Program does further reduce environmental impacts for the<br />

additional cost.<br />

At this stage in the alternative resource plan development and analysis, the 30-year NPV<br />

is similar for all plans. The differences largely lie in the level of environmental and public<br />

health impact.<br />

Based on the analysis presented above, it was decided to short-list four of the refined<br />

plans. The analysis of the refined plans is discussed in the next section.<br />

5.11 SHORT-LIST PLAN ANALYSIS<br />

The four short-listed alternative resource plans are presented in Table 5.11. The NPV of<br />

cost difference between the most and least is $121 million over the 30-year period. This<br />

difference is comprised of approximately $71 million difference due to the Enhanced<br />

Overflow Control Program and a $50 million difference due to the compliance timing for<br />

the Enhanced Nutrient Removal Program.<br />

Table 5.11<br />

Short-Listed Alternative Resource Plans<br />

Plan No.<br />

30 Yr. NPV<br />

$million<br />

Current WWTF<br />

Current<br />

Overflow<br />

Future WWTF<br />

Nutrient<br />

Future Overflow<br />

21-4 $2,458 B B B<br />

38-4 $2,507 B B A<br />

28-4 $2,529 B B B<br />

40-4 $2,579 B B A<br />

Baseline<br />

Enhanced<br />

The timing of the current WWTF compliance program and the current overflow control<br />

program has already been discussed under the refined plan analysis. The remaining<br />

decisions in connection with the short-listed plans are associated with the timing of<br />

nutrient control implementation and the level of future overflow control.<br />

As far as nutrient control timing is concerned, there is a $50 million cost increase for a<br />

program with a 10-year timetable compared to a program with a 20-year timetable.<br />

The expected benefits of the Enhanced Nutrient Removal Program by way of reductions<br />

in N and P loadings are shown in Figures 5.7 and 5.8. For illustrative purposes, the BLT<br />

and Mill Cove plants were not included in this analysis but would also have substantially<br />

reduced loadings with the Enhanced Nutrient Control Program. It should also be noted<br />

that operating permits for the WWTFs currently do not have total N limits.<br />

Revision: 2012-10-29 Integrated Resource Plan 73<br />

October 31 2012 Page 106 of 272

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!