volume 1 - Halifax Regional Municipality
volume 1 - Halifax Regional Municipality
volume 1 - Halifax Regional Municipality
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Statement Concerning <strong>Halifax</strong> Water IRP – Tellus Institute Team<br />
Summary of <strong>Halifax</strong> Water’s IRP Effort<br />
HW’s development of the Recommended Plan involved a multi-phase analysis. First, <strong>Halifax</strong><br />
Water identified three key drivers (growth, regulatory compliance, and asset renewal) and a set<br />
of IRP objectives, as well as major planning assumptions and uncertainties. These were the<br />
inputs from which HW developed an initial set of alternative resource plans to meet the water,<br />
wastewater, and stormwater service needs of the HW service territory through the year 2043. The<br />
alternative plans reflect the mid-range population growth projections that were recently updated<br />
by <strong>Halifax</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong>.<br />
HW’s 28 initial resource plans were evaluated not only in terms of 30-year net present value<br />
(NPV) costs, but also the approach and timing of compliance, the degree of overflow control, the<br />
level of asset renewal investment, and the potential environmental and public health impacts.<br />
Based on this analysis, the HW team identified 18 intermediate plans worthy of further<br />
consideration. This involved the elimination of a number of plans as less environmentally<br />
sustainable, the modification of certain plans to ensure consistent wastewater treatment<br />
programs, plus the addition of plans to allow examination of the full range of options for<br />
overflow control plans.<br />
The evaluation of the initial and intermediate plans revealed that asset renewal investments has<br />
the largest impact on cost of the three IRP drivers and accounted for the greatest variation in cost<br />
among the alternative plans. The HW team refined the asset renewal analysis, moving from a<br />
generic approach for all assets to one in which the risks and impacts of failure of each asset class<br />
were considered separately. Based on this assessment a single composite asset renewal strategy<br />
incorporating the risk-based preferred level of asset renewal for each asset class was developed.<br />
Applying the composite asset renewal strategy to the 18 intermediate plans resulted in a set of 10<br />
refined alternative resource plans and considerably reduced the NPV cost variation among the<br />
remaining plans. From the refined plans four plans were shortlisted based on HW’s assessment<br />
that a five-year schedule to meet current wastewater compliance requirements and a ten-year<br />
schedule to implement an overflow control strategy was achievable and appropriately balanced<br />
costs and risks.<br />
From the four short-listed plans a Recommended Plan was selected that incorporates a ten-year<br />
timeframe to meet expected new compliance requirements concerning wastewater nutrient levels<br />
(of particular relevance to the non-<strong>Halifax</strong> Harbor Solutions Plants that discharge to sensitive<br />
freshwater bodies) and implementation of an enhanced overflow control program that addresses<br />
all overflow locations over the 30-year period. The implementation of the Recommended Plan<br />
implies resource requirements well beyond HW’s existing levels of expenditure and a multiple of<br />
the proposed expenditures in its current Five-Year Capital Plan.<br />
Assessment of <strong>Halifax</strong> Water’s IRP<br />
This IRP represents significant progress in HW’s understanding of its existing system and its<br />
overall approach to planning. It reflects an intensive effort on the part of the HW team in the face<br />
of significant challenges and provides a solid foundation upon which to build a more<br />
October 31 2012 Page 269 of 272<br />
2